首页> 外文OA文献 >Why price inflation in developed countries is systematically underestimated
【2h】

Why price inflation in developed countries is systematically underestimated

机译:为什么发达国家的价格通胀被系统地低估了

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

There is an extensive historical dataset on real GDP per capita prepared by Angus Maddison. This dataset covers the period since 1870 with continuous annual estimates in developed countries. All time series for individual economies have a clear structural break between 1940 and 1950. The behavior before 1940 and after 1950 can be accurately (R2 from 0.7 to 0.99) approximated by linear time trends. The corresponding slopes of regressions lines before and after the break differ by a factor of 4 (Switzerland) to 19 (Spain). We have extrapolated the early trends into the second interval and obtained much lower estimates of real GDP per capita in 2011: from 2.4 (Switzerland) to 5.0 (Japan) times smaller than the current levels. When the current linear trends are extrapolated into the past, they intercept the zero line between 1908 (Switzerland) and 1944 (Japan). There is likely an internal conflict between the estimating procedures before 1940 and after 1950. A reasonable explanation of the discrepancy is that the GDP deflator in developed countries has been highly underestimated since 1950. In the USA, the GDP deflator is underestimated by a factor of 1.4. This is exactly the ratio of the interest rate controlled by the Federal Reserve and the rate of inflation. Hence, the Federal Reserve actually retains its interest rate at the level of true price inflation when corrected for the bias in the GDP deflator.
机译:由安格斯·麦迪森(Angus Maddison)编写的关于实际人均GDP的广泛历史数据集。该数据集涵盖了自1870年以来的时期,并在发达国家进行了连续的年度估算。各个经济体的所有时间序列在1940年和1950年之间都有明显的结构性中断。可以通过线性时间趋势准确地估算1940年之前和1950年之后的行为(R2从0.7到0.99)。休息前后回归线的相应斜率相差4(瑞士)到19(西班牙)。我们将早期趋势推算到第二个区间中,并获得了更低的2011年人均实际GDP估算:从当前水平的2.4倍(瑞士)降至5.0倍(日本)。当将当前线性趋势外推到过去时,它们会截取1908年(瑞士)和1944年(日本)之间的零线。 1940年之前和1950年之后的估算程序之间可能存在内部冲突。对这一差异的合理解释是,自1950年以来,发达国家的GDP平减指数被低估了。在美国,GDP平减指数被低估了一个因素。 1.4。这正是美联储控制的利率与通货膨胀率之比。因此,在对GDP平减指数的偏差进行校正后,美联储实际上将其利率保持在真实价格通胀的水平。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kitov Ivan;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号