首页> 外文OA文献 >Flexibility, but for whom? : A new approach to examining labour market flexibility across Europe using company level data
【2h】

Flexibility, but for whom? : A new approach to examining labour market flexibility across Europe using company level data

机译:灵活性,但对谁? :使用公司层面数据检查整个欧洲劳动力市场灵活性的新方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Labour market flexibility continues to be one of the key issues in the reform of labour markets in welfare states. The way in which various countries adapt to this need differs according to their institutions and prevailing strategies. Despite the vast numbers of studies addressing this issue, labour market flexibility has been examined predominantly by concentrating on the arrangements that firms adopt to adjust to market fluctuations. Thus flexibility arrangements are perceived to exist only to facilitate employers’ or companies’ needs. However, flexibility in the labour market also enables individuals to accommodate various needs that occur throughout their life course and to facilitate one’s work-life balance. As companies adapt to business cycles with labour market flexibility, workers adapt to life cycles with it. Based on this definition, flexibility practices of companies can be measured two dimensionally, on one side its overall level and another to whom it is (more) geared towards, workers or the company. In addition, this study examines flexibility at the establishment level, in contrast to previous studies of flexibility which focus on the institutional/regulatory level or the individual behavioural level.The aims of this project are three-fold: firstly to examine the various practices of flexibility in companies to see if flexibility can indeed be partitioned as described above; secondly through aggregating company data to the country level, see whether there are cross-national variances in the degree and focus of flexibility practices; and lastly to investigate the relationship between the use of flexibility options for employers and those for employees. The data used to answer these questions is the European Survey of Working-Time and Work-life Balance, a survey based on the establishment level covering 21 EU member states for the year 2004/2005. The outcomes show that based on the practices of companies, flexibility can indeed be distinguished depending on whose flexibility it accommodates. Moreover, they show that countries where the average company has more flexibility arrangements for employers it provides more arrangements for employees as well, and there seems to be more variation in the provision of the latter than the former.
机译:劳动力市场的灵活性仍然是福利国家劳动力市场改革的关键问题之一。各国适应这种需求的方式因其机构和现行策略而异。尽管针对这一问题进行了大量的研究,但劳动力市场的灵活性主要通过集中于企业为适应市场波动而采取的安排进行了研究。因此,人们认为存在灵活性安排只是为了满足雇主或公司的需求。但是,劳动力市场的灵活性也使个人能够适应他们一生中发生的各种需求,并促进工作与生活之间的平衡。随着公司通过劳动力市场灵活性适应业务周期,工人也随之适应了生命周期。基于此定义,可以从两方面来衡量公司的灵活性实践,一方面是总体水平,另一方面是(更多)针对工人或公司。此外,本研究在机构层面上研究了灵活性,而以前的灵活性研究则侧重于制度/监管层面或个人行为层面。本项目的目标是三方面的:首先,研究企业的各种实践公司的灵活性,以查看是否确实可以如上所述划分灵活性;其次,通过将公司数据汇总到国家/地区级别,了解灵活性实践的程度和重点是否存在跨国差异;最后调查雇主和雇员使用灵活性选项之间的关系。用于回答这些问题的数据是《欧洲工作时间和工作与生活平衡调查》,该调查基于2004/2005年度涵盖21个欧盟成员国的机构水平。结果表明,根据公司的实践,可以根据其适应性来区分灵活性。而且,它们表明,在平均公司对雇主有更多灵活性安排的国家中,它也为雇员提供了更多的安排,并且后者的提供似乎比前者更多。

著录项

  • 作者

    Chung Heejung;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2006
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号