首页> 外文OA文献 >THE AFTA-CEPT and the ASEAN-China Early Harvest Program: An Assessment of Potential Short-run Impact
【2h】

THE AFTA-CEPT and the ASEAN-China Early Harvest Program: An Assessment of Potential Short-run Impact

机译:aFTa-CEpT和东盟 - 中国早期收获计划:对潜在短期影响的评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Theoretical and empirical support for a more liberal trading environment has grown increasingly over the years. In the last decade, many countries have aggressively pursued unilateral trade liberalization. Based on decadal growth rates, globalizing developing countries has outpaced growth of non-globalizing developing economies in the 1980’s and 1990’s. Aside from participation in regular WTO Ministerial to discuss multilateral trade issues, many countries have also entered into bilateral and regional trade agreements (RTA’s). Since 1995, the WTO has received 130 notifications regarding the creation of RTA’s which is slightly higher than the notifications received by GATT over its almost fifty years of existence. In this paper, we aim to sift thru the effects of trade policy on agriculture, focusing in particular on the possible short-run impact of the Common External Preferential Tariffs under the ASEAN Free Trade Agreement (AFTA-CEPT) and the ASEAN-China Early Harvest Program (EHP). While few would argue about the long-run benefits from a liberal trade regime, fewer still would deny the possible short-run adjustment costs that could accompany trade reforms. As such, it would help policy makers to be cognizant of the possible ramifications of pursuing a particular trade strategy. We provide an overview of the Philippine trade policy leading to the AFTA-CEPT and the EHP and isolate their impact. The immediate impact of trade policy is on the effective rate of protection it provides to various sectors. How uniform it is or how diverse reflects the relative protection, how much one sector is favored over another. Ultimately, the resulting trade protection structure would impact on output, income and employment. We measure how the EHP and AFTA impact on these variables. We employ a simulation model following an earlier study under the Joint Tariff Commission-PIDS (TC-PIDS) Study. The simulation analysis is done for three scenarios: (1) the Early Harvest Program, (2) the AFTA-CEPT, and (3) a hypothetical Base scenario reverting tariffs to 1994 levels which allows for comparative analysis that can be useful for policy formulation.
机译:多年来,对更加自由的贸易环境的理论和经验支持越来越多。在过去的十年中,许多国家都在积极追求单边贸易自由化。基于十年的增长率,发展中国家的全球化在1980年代和1990年代已经超过了非全球化的发展中国家。除了参加定期的世贸组织部长级会议讨论多边贸易问题外,许多国家还签署了双边和区域贸易协定。自1995年以来,WTO收到了130份关于建立RTA的通知,该数量略高于关贸总协定存在近五十年的通知。在本文中,我们旨在探讨贸易政策对农业的影响,特别是着眼于《东盟自由贸易协定》(AFTA-CEPT)和《东盟中国早期协定》下的共同外部特惠关税的短期影响。收获计划(EHP)。尽管很少有人会争论自由贸易体制的长期利益,但很少有人会否认贸易改革可能带来的短期调整成本。因此,这将有助于决策者认识到实行特定贸易战略可能产生的后果。我们概述了导致AFTA-CEPT和EHP的菲律宾贸易政策,并隔离了它们的影响。贸易政策的直接影响在于它向各个部门提供的有效保护率。它的统一程度或多样性反映了相对的保护,一个部门胜于另一个部门。最终,由此产生的贸易保护结构将影响产出,收入和就业。我们测量了EHP和AFTA对这些变量的影响。我们根据联合关税委员会-PIDS(TC-PIDS)研究的早期研究,采用了模拟模型。针对以下三种情况进行了模拟分析:(1)早期收获计划;(2)AFTA-CEPT;(3)假设基本情景将关税恢复到1994年的水平,这允许进行比较分析,这对政策制定很有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号