首页> 外文OA文献 >Improving the conditions of workers? Minimum wage legilsation and anit-sweatshop activism
【2h】

Improving the conditions of workers? Minimum wage legilsation and anit-sweatshop activism

机译:改善工人的条件?最低工资legilsation和anit-sweatshop活动

摘要

During the 1990s, anti-sweatshop activists increased their efforts to improve working conditions and raise wages for workers in developing countries. Indonesia, home to dozens of Nike, Reebok, and Adidas subcontractors, was a primary target for these activists. At the same time, the Indonesian government (prompted by the U.S. government) greatly increased the minimum wage throughout Indonesia. This article analyzed the impact of these two differenttypes of interventions on labor market outcomes in Indonesian manufacturing. The results suggest that the more than doubling of the real value of the minimum wage resulted in a 35 percent increase in real wages for unskilled workers between 1990 and 1996. The anti-sweatshop campaigns also had a significant impact on wages. Our research suggests that unskilled real wages increased by an additional 20 percent for exporters and multinational plants in sweatshop industries, defined as textiles, footwear, and apparel. The combined effects of the minimum wage legislation and the antisweatshop campaigns led to more than a 50 percent increase in real wages and adoubling of nominal wages for unskilled workers at targeted exporting plants. One question that naturally arises is how this could possibly be achieved without adverse consequences for employment.'"^ In our research, we tested whether these higher wages led firms to cut employment or shut down operations. The minimum wage increases led to employment losses of as much as 10 percentage points for unskilled workers across all sectors in manufacturing. Surprisingly, however, anti-sweatshop activism did not have significant adverse effects on employment in the TFA sectors. The fact that wages soared and employmentremained steady in textiles and apparel suggests that the anti-sweatshop movement had a positive impact on workers in these factories. This is a surprising and unintuitive result that suggests that anti-sweatshop activism in Indonesia was a "win-win" situation. Despite the rising labor costs during this period, increased market demand for textile, footwear, and apparel products led to net employment increases in foreign and exporting firms.
机译:在1990年代,反血汗工厂的积极分子加大了努力,以改善发展中国家的工作条件并提高工人的工资。印度尼西亚是数十个耐克,锐步和阿迪达斯分包商的所在地,是这些活动家的主要目标。同时,印度尼西亚政府(由美国政府推动)大大提高了整个印度尼西亚的最低工资。本文分析了这两种不同类型的干预措施对印尼制造业劳动力市场成果的影响。结果表明,最低工资的实际价值增加了​​一倍以上,导致非熟练工人的实际工资在1990年至1996年之间增加了35%。反血汗工厂运动也对工资产生了重大影响。我们的研究表明,血汗工厂行业(定义为纺织品,鞋类和服装)中的出口商和跨国工厂的非熟练人员实际工资再增加了20%。最低工资立法和反汗工厂运动的共同作用导致目标出口工厂的非熟练工人的实际工资增长了50%以上,名义工资翻了一番。自然产生的一个问题是,如何在不对就业造成不利影响的情况下实现这一目标。'“ ^在我们的研究中,我们测试了这些较高的工资是否导致企业裁员或关闭公司。制造业各个部门的非熟练工人的比例高达10个百分点,但是令人惊讶的是,反汗工厂的激进主义并未对TFA部门的就业产生重大不利影响。事实是,工资飙升且纺织品和服装的就业率保持稳定的事实表明:反血汗工厂运动对这些工厂的工人产生了积极的影响,这是一个令人惊讶且不直观的结果,表明印度尼西亚的反血汗工厂激进主义是一种“双赢”的局面。对纺织品,鞋类和服装产品的市场需求导致外国和出口公司的净就业人数增加。

著录项

  • 作者

    Harrison Ann; Scorse Jason;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2005
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号