首页> 外文OA文献 >The Google Book search settlement: A law and economics analysis
【2h】

The Google Book search settlement: A law and economics analysis

机译:Google图书搜索结算:法律和经济学分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Beginning in December 2004 Google has pursued a new project to create a book search engine (Google Book Search). The project has released a storm of controversy around the globe. While the supporters of Google Book Search conceive the project as a first reasonable step towards unlimited access to knowledge in the information age, its opponents fear profound negative effects due to an erosion of copyright law.Our law and economics analysis of the Book Search Project suggests that – from a copyright perspective – the proposed settlement may be beneficial to right holders, consumers, and Google. For instance, it may provide a solution to the still unsolved dilemma of orphan works. From a competition policy perspective, we stress the important aspect that Google’s pricing algorithm for orphan and unclaimed works effectively replicates a competitive Nash-Bertrand market outcome under post-settlement, third-party oversight.
机译:从2004年12月开始,Google推行了一个创建图书搜索引擎(Google图书搜索)的新项目。该项目在全球范围内引发了争议。虽然Google图书搜索的支持者认为该项目是朝着信息时代无限获取知识迈出的第一个合理步骤,但其反对者担心由于版权法的侵蚀而产生了深远的负面影响。我们对图书搜索项目的法律和经济学分析表明从版权的角度来看,拟议的和解协议可能对权利人,消费者和Google有利。例如,它可以为尚未解决的孤儿难题提供解决方案。从竞争政策的角度来看,我们强调了一个重要方面,即Google对孤儿和无人认领的作品的定价算法可以有效地复制在结算后第三方监督下具有竞争性的Nash-Bertrand市场结果。

著录项

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号