首页> 外文OA文献 >Are Real Options “Real”? Isolating Uncertainty from Risk in Real Options Analysis
【2h】

Are Real Options “Real”? Isolating Uncertainty from Risk in Real Options Analysis

机译:真实选择是“真实的”吗?在实物期权分析中将不确定性与风险隔离开来

摘要

This paper derives an adjusted Black-Scholes pricing formula. In separating riskand uncertainty using the robust control technique, we find that both uncertainty andrisk raise management’s subjective evaluation of real options. We suggest a simplemethod to filter the risk of the project and to acquire a more reliable value of realoptions without the influence of uncertainty. In addition, we propose that aninvestment opportunity may be postponed inappropriately, as under uncertainty theexercise of investment may be delayed by the project manager. To our knowledge, anysimilar quantitative methods have not hitherto been mentioned in terms of isolatinguncertainty from risk in real options analysis that we consider here.
机译:本文推导了调整后的Black-Scholes定价公式。在使用健壮的控制技术分离风险和不确定性时,我们发现不确定性和风险都提高了管理层对实物期权的主观评估。我们建议一种简单的方法来过滤项目风险,并在不受不确定性影响的情况下获得更可靠的实物期权价值。另外,我们建议投资机会可能被不适当地推迟,因为在不确定的情况下,项目经理可能会推迟投资的执行时间。据我们所知,到目前为止,在将实物期权分析中的不确定性与风险隔离方面,尚未提及任何类似的定量方法。

著录项

  • 作者

    So Leh-chyan;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"english","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号