首页> 外文OA文献 >School choice in the light of the effectiveness differences of various types of public and private school in 19 OECD countries
【2h】

School choice in the light of the effectiveness differences of various types of public and private school in 19 OECD countries

机译:根据经合组织国家19个国家的各类公立和私立学校的有效性差异,选择学校

摘要

The paper approaches the issue of school choice in an indirect manner by investigating the effectiveness of public, private government-dependent and private independent schools in 19 OECD countries selected from the PISA 2000 survey for this purpose. In a multi-level approach we estimate these sector-effects, controlling for sociological characteristics of students and parents, school composition, teaching and learning conditions of schools and students’ and principals’ perception of the climate of their schools. The main explanation of the gross differences in mathematical achievement is the better social composition of private schools, both government-dependent and independent, which is a clear consequence of school choice. But our analysis also reveals that private independent schools are less effective than public schools with the same students, parents and social composition, while that private dependent schools are more effective than comparable public schools. The explanation of these remaining net differences in mathematical achievement seems to be the better school climate of private dependent schools. The comparison concludes that these net differences in mathematical achievement between public and private school-sectors are equal across nations, despite the historical and legal variations in their educational systems and school choice approaches.
机译:本文通过调查从PISA 2000调查中选出的19个经合组织国家中的公立,私立政府依赖和私立独立学校的有效性,以间接的方式探讨了择校问题。我们采用多层次的方法估算这些部门的影响,控制学生和家长的社会学特征,学校组成,学校的教与学条件以及学生和校长对学校气候的看法。数学成绩的巨大差异的主要解释是私立学校的较好社会组成,无论是政府依赖还是私立,这都是学校选择的明显结果。但是,我们的分析还表明,私立私立学校的生计,父母和社会组成相同的私立学校比公立学校的效率低,而私立依赖学校比同等的公立学校更有效。这些数学成绩上仍然存在的净差异的解释似乎是私立依赖学校的更好的学校氛围。比较得出的结论是,尽管教育系统和学校选择方法存在历史和法律差异,但公立和私立学校部门在数学成绩上的这些净差异在各个国家之间是相同的。

著录项

  • 作者

    Dronkers J.; Robert Peter;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2005
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号