首页> 外文OA文献 >Exploring Indigenous Methodological Perspectives in Cultural Resource Management: The Case Study of the Ram’s Head Medicine Tree
【2h】

Exploring Indigenous Methodological Perspectives in Cultural Resource Management: The Case Study of the Ram’s Head Medicine Tree

机译:探索文化资源管理中的本土方法论视角 - 拉姆头脑医学树案例研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This thesis suggests that the state of cooperation between Native American peoples and the archaeological community today is a product of historical circumstances. The historical situation is characterized by the frustration felt by Native American communities as to the treatment of cultural resources. Two questions were posed: How can an indigenous methodological perspective operate effectively within state and federal Cultural Resource Management (CRM) frameworks concerning the identification, evaluation, assessment, and treatment of cultural properties? How are the laws and practices that regulate indigenous and scientific communities in the practice of archaeology and CRM, adaptable to the ideals of an indigenous methodological perspective? This thesis aims to clarify distinctions between western scientific and indigenous methodological perspectives within the practice of cultural resource management. The basis of the discussion is centered on authority and cultural values, and illustrated in the case study of the Ram’s Head Medicine Tree. A landscape perspective is utilized as a bridge for understanding, which accounts for scientific and traditional knowledge systems. Ultimately this thesis suggests that an indigenous methodological paradigm concerning the research and management of traditional cultural properties can contribute to archaeological knowledge and understanding of indigenous peoples within the western scientific archaeological community.
机译:本文认为,今天的美洲原住民与考古界之间的合作状态是历史情况的产物。历史情况的特点是美洲原住民社区对文化资源的待遇感到沮丧。提出了两个问题:在有关文化财产的识别,评估,评估和处理的州和联邦文化资源管理(CRM)框架内,土著方法论观点如何有效运作?在考古学和客户关系管理实践中规范土著和科学界的法律和实践如何适应土著方法论观点的理想?本文旨在阐明文化资源管理实践中西方科学方法论与本土方法论观点之间的区别。讨论的基础是权威和文化价值,并在Ram的头药树的案例研究中进行了说明。景观视角被用作理解的桥梁,它解释了科学和传统知识系统。最终,本论文表明,有关传统文化财产的研究和管理的土著方法论范式可有助于考古学知识和对西方科学考古学社区内土著人民的了解。

著录项

  • 作者

    Nicolai Dean;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号