首页> 外文OA文献 >Homegrown Terror: Benedict Arnold and the Burning of New London
【2h】

Homegrown Terror: Benedict Arnold and the Burning of New London

机译:本土恐怖:本尼迪克特阿诺德和新伦敦的燃烧

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Benedict Arnold was a man who could have been a “founding father” of America, but instead became a national villain. His brutal attack on Connecticut epitomizes this transformation: the moment where an abstract idea of betrayal completes its evolution to the slaughter and destruction of his neighbors and their homes. Focusing on this significant but unfortunately forgotten incident addresses some of the major challenges of any discussion about this complex and confusing American figure. It also directly links Arnold’s story with the stories of his friends and colleagues, something that has never been done before. The combination of these two approaches puts the focus on Arnold’s effects rather than his motives, and on the victims rather than the attacker. Moreover, it reframes his “treason” as “homegrown terror,” a term that resonates with modern readers and whose definition echoes the 18th century word “parricide,” used by many contemporaries to describe Arnold’s actions.
机译:本尼迪克特·阿诺德(Benedict Arnold)曾是美国的“开国元勋”,但后来成为国家的恶棍。他对康涅狄格州的残酷攻击体现了这种转变:抽象的背叛观念使这一转变演变成对他的邻居及其家园的屠杀和破坏的那一刻。关注这一重大但不幸的是被遗忘的事件,可以解决有关这个复杂而令人困惑的美国人物的任何讨论所面临的一些主要挑战。它还将Arnold的故事与他的朋友和同事的故事直接联系在一起,这是以前从未做过的。两种方法的结合将重点放在了阿诺德的影响上而不是他的动机上,而把重点放在了受害者而不是攻击者上。此外,它把他的“叛国罪”重新定义为“本土恐怖”,这个词引起了现代读者的共鸣,其定义呼应了18世纪的“杀人罪”,许多当代人都用它来形容阿诺德的行为。

著录项

  • 作者

    Lehman Eric D.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en_US
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号