首页> 外文OA文献 >Children’s Rights and the Parental Authority to Instill a Specific Value System
【2h】

Children’s Rights and the Parental Authority to Instill a Specific Value System

机译:儿童的权利和父母权力灌输特定的价值体系

摘要

Liberals who want to support multiculturalism need to be able to justify the parental authority to instill cultural value systems or worldviews into children. However, such authority may be at odds with liberal demands that citizens be autonomous. This paper argues that parents do not have the legitimate authority to instill in their children a specific value system, contrary to the complex and intriguing arguments of Robert Noggle (2002). Noggle’s argument, which draws heavily on key ideas in Rawls’ theory of justice, is that children are not moral agents and that parents are in a special kind of fiduciary relationship vis-à-vis their children. Noggle’s position is contrasted with the more limited conception of parental authority advanced by David Archard (2002). I argue that we can accept that parents are agents of their children, but contra Noggle, this does not entitle them to impose their parochial value systems onto their children. I argue that while children have an interest in acquiring values, they do not have an interest in acquiring a value system.
机译:想要支持多元文化主义的自由主义者需要能够证明父母的权威为孩子灌输文化价值体系或世界观。但是,这种权威可能与要求公民自治的自由主义要求背道而驰。本文认为,与罗伯特·诺格格(Robert Noggle,2002)复杂而有趣的论点相反,父母没有向孩子灌输特定价值体系的合法权力。 Noggle的论点很大程度上借鉴了罗尔斯的正义理论中的关键思想,即孩子不是道德行为者,父母相对于孩子而言处于特殊的信托关系。 Noggle的立场与David Archard(2002)提出的更为有限的父母权威概念形成鲜明对比。我认为我们可以接受父母是子女的代理人,但是与Noggle相反,这并不意味着父母有权将其狭value的价值体系强加于子女。我认为,尽管孩子对获取价值感兴趣,但对获取价值体系却不感兴趣。

著录项

  • 作者

    Morgan Jeffrey;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2006
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号