首页> 外文OA文献 >The Use of a Mobile Compression Device Following a Lower Extremity Total Joint Arthroplasty Can Provide Venous Thromboembolic Prophylaxis Comparable to Current Pharmacological Anticoagulation Protocols
【2h】

The Use of a Mobile Compression Device Following a Lower Extremity Total Joint Arthroplasty Can Provide Venous Thromboembolic Prophylaxis Comparable to Current Pharmacological Anticoagulation Protocols

机译:下肢全关节置换术后使用移动加压装置可提供与目前药理抗凝方案相当的静脉血栓栓塞预防

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: Venous thromboembolisms (VTE) are an important complication following arthroplasty of the knees and hips, and proper prophylaxis protocol continues to be a source of debate in the medical community. In the past patients have been managed with pharmaceutical anticoagulants (eg, LMWH), mechanical compression, or a combination of the two. The inability to use mechanical compression on an outpatient basis has limited its use in the past, but the introduction of an outpatient mobile compression devices (MCDs) that monitors compliance has brought mobile compression devices to the forefront of VTE prophylaxis research. The aim of this review is to evaluate the use of MCDs as compared to pharmaceutical anticoagulants.Methods: Exhaustive search was conducted using Medline-OVID, CINAHL, and Web of Science using the keywords: mobile compression. All results were reviewed and selected according to the predefined eligibility criteria. Relevant articles were assessed for quality using GRADE.Results: Two studies met inclusion criteria and were included in this systematic review. A randomized control trial with 414 participants was unable to determine equivalency between the MCD and LMWH at VTE prophylaxis due to small sample size. They were however able to demonstrate a significant decrease in major bleeding events with use of the MCD. A prospective observational study with 23 260 participants demonstrated statistically noninferior VTE prophylaxis between the MCD group and the pharmaceutical anticoagulant group.Conclusion: Use of a MCD following a total joint arthroplasty (TJA) in the lower extremity may provide statistically noninferior VTE prevention rates when compared to the current pharmacological treatment options. Unlike pharmacologic anticoagulants, the use of a MCD does not increase the ris of a major bleeding event. This elimination of major bleeding complications makes implementation of MCD use following a TJA instead of anticoagulants a promising option for cost effective VTE prophylaxis.Keywords: Mobile compression, Arthroplasty, Venous thromboembolism, pharmaceutical anticoagulants
机译:背景:静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)是膝关节和髋关节置换术后的重要并发症,而正确的预防措施仍然是医学界争论的焦点。过去,患者接受过药物抗凝剂(例如LMWH),机械加压或两者结合治疗。过去无法在门诊病人身上使用机械加压已经限制了它的使用,但是引入门诊病人移动加压装置(MCD)来监视依从性使移动加压装置成为VTE预防研究的前沿。这项审查的目的是评估与药物抗凝剂相比MCD的使用。方法:穷举搜索使用Medline-OVID,CINAHL和Web of Science进行,关键词为:移动压缩。根据预定义的资格标准对所有结果进行了审查和选择。结果:使用GRADE对相关文章进行了质量评估。结果:两项研究符合纳入标准,被纳入本系统评价。由于样本量小,有414名参与者的随机对照试验无法确定VTE预防时MCD和LMWH的等效性。然而,他们使用MCD能够证明主要出血事件显着减少。一项针对23260名参与者的前瞻性观察性研究表明,MCD组和药物抗凝剂组之间的VTE预防效果在统计学上均不差。结论:下肢全关节置换术(TJA)后使用MCD可以提供统计上较差的VTE预防率到目前的药物治疗选择。与药理抗凝剂不同,使用MCD不会增加大出血事件的风险。消除主要出血并发症使TJA替代抗凝剂替代MCD成为实现经济有效的VTE预防的有前途的选择。关键词:移动加压,关节成形术,静脉血栓栓塞,药物抗凝剂

著录项

  • 作者

    Roskelley McKel A;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号