首页> 外文OA文献 >Appropriate Digital Nerve Block Technique: The Single-Injection Subcutaneous Volar Block Versus the Two-Injection Dorsal Digital Block
【2h】

Appropriate Digital Nerve Block Technique: The Single-Injection Subcutaneous Volar Block Versus the Two-Injection Dorsal Digital Block

机译:适当的数字神经阻滞技术:单次注射皮下掌侧阻滞与两次注射背侧数字阻滞

摘要

Background: Finger injuries are a common chief complaint in the emergency department (ED) and primary care setting. Repair of these injuries often require digital anesthesia through performing a digital nerve block (DNB). The two-injection subcutaneous volar block (SVB) and a two-injection dorsal digital block (DDB) are two of the most prevalently performed digital blocks in practice today. This systematic review examines which DNB technique is most appropriate and attempts to offer a recommendation for a standardized level of care.Methods: An extensive literature search was performed using Medline-OVID, Medline-PubMed, CINAHL, and Google Scholar. The following keywords were searched individually and in combination: digital anesthesia, digital block, and finger block. Inclusion criteria consisted of trials comparing the SVB and the DDB from 2007 to present. All articles were assessed for quality using GRADE.Results: The search resulted in 114 articles that were narrowed down to 32 by limiting articles to human studies written in English and published after 2007. The abstracts and titles were then hand searched for trials comparing the SVB and the DDB. Final articles meeting all inclusion criteria were three studies, two RCTs and one quasi-experimental. The primary outcome of successful anesthesia was measured and the quasi-experimental showed the SVB being more effective than the DDB and the two RCTs provided data with no significant difference between the two digital blocks. A secondary outcome of the patients’ pain score of the injection was also measured by two of the studies and no statistical significance was found.Conclusion: The SVB is equally effective in delivering anesthesia as the DDB but is only a single injection making it less invasive, easier to perform and teach, and avoids the risk of damaging the finger nerves. For these reasons a safe recommendation come be made for the use of the SVB when repairing a finger injury that is not located on the dorsal aspect of the proximal phalanx in which case is the only clinical scenario that the DDB should be utilized.
机译:背景:手指受伤是急诊室和基层医疗机构普遍的主要主诉。这些损伤的修复通常需要通过执行指神经阻滞(DNB)来进行指麻。两次注射皮下掌侧阻滞(SVB)和两次注射背侧数字阻滞(DDB)是当今实践中执行最广泛的两个数字阻滞。这项系统的审查检查了哪种DNB技术最合适,并试图为标准化护理水平提供建议。方法:使用Medline-OVID,Medline-PubMed,CINAHL和Google Scholar进行了广泛的文献检索。分别或组合搜索以下关键字:数字麻醉,数字阻滞和手指阻滞。纳入标准包括比较2007年至今SVB和DDB的试验。结果:通过搜索将结果限制在以英语撰写并于2007年后发表的人类研究文章中,对114篇文章的搜索结果缩小到32篇。然后,摘要和标题将被手工搜索以比较SVB和DDB。符合所有入选标准的最终文章为三项研究,两项RCT和一项半实验性研究。测量了麻醉成功的主要结果,并且准实验显示SVB比DDB更有效,并且两个RCT提供的数据在两个数字模块之间没有显着差异。两项研究也测量了患者疼痛评分的次要结果,但无统计学意义。结论:SVB与DDB一样在麻醉方面同样有效,但仅一次注射就降低了侵入性,更易于执行和教学,并避免了损害手指神经的风险。由于这些原因,当修复手指损伤时,就建议使用SVB,该损伤不位于近端指骨的背侧,在这种情况下,唯一应采用DDB的临床方案是。

著录项

  • 作者

    Madsen Roman;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号