首页> 外文OA文献 >Do Eco-Innovations Harm Productivity Growth through Crowding Out? Results of an Extended CDM Model for Italy
【2h】

Do Eco-Innovations Harm Productivity Growth through Crowding Out? Results of an Extended CDM Model for Italy

机译:生态创新是否通过挤出危害生产力增长?意大利扩展CDm模型的结果

摘要

This paper discusses the results for Italy of a CDM model (Crepon et al, 1998) further extended with the objective of evaluating drivers and productivity effects of environmental innovations. The particular nature of environmental innovations, especially as regards the need ofudgovernment intervention to create market opportunities, is likely to affect the way through which they are pursued (innovation equation within the CDM model) and their effect on productivity (productivity equation). Here I test two main hypothesis: (i) to what extent polluting firmsudrely on own innovations to improve their environmental performance? (ii) do the pursue of environmental innovations reduce the likelihood of obtaining other profitable innovations (crowding out)? Results, basedudon administrative data (AIDA by Bureau van Dijk and patent data from PATSTAT) show that innovation efforts of polluting firms and sectors is significantly biased towards environmental innovations and that environmental innovations tend to crowd out other more profitableud(at least in the short run) innovations.
机译:本文讨论了CDM模型在意大利的研究结果(Crepon等,1998),其结果进一步扩展为评估环境创新的驱动力和生产率影响。环境创新的特殊性质,尤其是在政府干预中创造市场机会的需要方面,很可能会影响其追求的方式(CDM模型内的创新方程式)及其对生产率的影响(生产力方程式)。在这里,我检验两个主要假设:(i)在多大程度上污染企业对自己的创新的污染以改善其环境绩效? (ii)追求环境创新是否会降低获得其他有利可图的创新(排挤)的可能性?基于 udon行政数据(Bureau van Dijk的AIDA和PATSTAT的专利数据)的结果表明,污染企业和部门的创新努力明显偏向于环境创新,而环境创新往往会挤出其他更有利可图的 ud(至少在短期内)创新。

著录项

  • 作者

    Marin Giovanni;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号