首页> 外文OA文献 >For Interval Computations, if Absolute-Accuracy Optimization is NP-Hard, then so is Relative-Accuracy Optimization
【2h】

For Interval Computations, if Absolute-Accuracy Optimization is NP-Hard, then so is Relative-Accuracy Optimization

机译:对于区间计算,如果绝对精度优化是Np-Hard,那么相对精度优化也是如此

摘要

One of the basic problems of interval computations is to compute a range of a given function f(x1,...,xn) over a given box (i.e., to compute the maximum and the minimum of the function on the box). For many classes of functions (e.g., for quadratic functions) this problem is NP-hard; it is even NP-hard if instead of computing the minimum and maximum exactly, we want to compute them with a given (absolute) accuracy. In practical situations, it is more realistic to ask for a relative accuracy; are the corresponding problems still NP-hard? We show that under some reasonable conditions, NP-hardness of absolute-accuracy optimization implies that relative-accuracy optimization is NP-hard as well.
机译:间隔计算的基本问题之一是在给定的盒子上计算给定函数f(x1,...,xn)的范围(即计算盒子上函数的最大值和最小值)。对于许多类的函数(例如,对于二次函数),此问题是NP难题。如果我们想以给定的(绝对)精度来计算它们,而不是精确地计算最大值和最小值,那甚至是NP难的。在实际情况下,要求相对准确是更现实的。相应的问题仍然难解决吗?我们表明,在一些合理的条件下,绝对精度优化的NP难度意味着相对精度优化也是NP困难的。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kreinovich Vladik;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1999
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号