首页> 外文OA文献 >An Efficient Standardized Method of Maintaining Quality Assurance in Therapeutic Treatment Record Keeping
【2h】

An Efficient Standardized Method of Maintaining Quality Assurance in Therapeutic Treatment Record Keeping

机译:一种保持治疗记录保持质量保证的有效标准化方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Quality assurance (QA) within the field of mental health is the practice of monitoring and reviewing services to ensure adherence to specified standards of care. Agents within State governments and various organizations influence record keeping procedures through ethical guidelines and law. For instance, client records must be maintained for all clients receiving mental health services, including informed consent, releases of information, treatment plans, and progress notes. Accurate and timely record keeping procedures assure quality mental health services. However, professionals sometimes err in the maintenance of client records, which can have a negative impact on services, clients, and practitioners. To assist proper record keeping practices, QA programs have been developed to facilitate training in managing and monitoring records. The effects of QA programs specific to mental health record keeping have yet to be examined in controlled experimental context. Therefore, this study was conducted to empirically develop and initially evaluate a QA program to assist in monitoring records within the context of a mental health clinic. The number of errors in client records committed before and after implementation of the developed QA program was examined. It was hypothesized that the QA program would be feasible to implement and significantly decrease record keeping errors. An intra-class correlation was computed to examine inter-rater reliability, revealing a moderate level of agreement regarding individual errors using the QA Fidelity of Client Records Form. Separate MANOVAu27s indicated significant differences between QA and non-QA records for types of errors but not for errors based on specific record forms. Specifically, QA records exhibited fewer missing forms and missing dates compared to non-QA records. An independent samples t-test revealed significant group differences for total number of errors. Thus, QA records exhibited fewer total errors compared to non-QA records. Chi-square analysis also resulted in significant group differences, indicating QA records were more organized than non-QA records. Correlational analysis revealed significant negative linear relationships between frequency of QA audits and missing forms, missing dates, and total errors. Thus, as QA audits increased the number of missing forms, dates, and total number of errors decreased. Results suggest that the current QA program may assist in reducing errors, and organizing, mental health records. The QA program utilized in the current study was also determined to be cost-effective and feasible, requiring little time to implement. The current study has implications for improvement in client record keeping through the implementation of QA programming within community-based mental health agencies.
机译:精神卫生领域的质量保证(QA)是监视和审查服务以确保遵守特定护理标准的做法。州政府和各个组织中的代理人通过道德准则和法律影响记录保存程序。例如,必须为所有接受心理健康服务的客户保存客户记录,包括知情同意书,信息发布,治疗计划和进度说明。准确及时的记录保存程序可确保提供优质的心理健康服务。但是,专业人员有时会错误地维护客户记录,这可能会对服务,客户和从业人员产生负面影响。为了帮助正确地保存记录,已制定了质量检查计划,以促进培​​训管理和监视记录。专门针对心理健康记录的质量保证计划的效果尚未在受控的实验环境中进行检验。因此,进行这项研究的目的是根据经验制定并初步评估质量保证计划,以协助在精神卫生诊所内监测记录。在实施已开发的质量检查程序之前和之后,对客户记录中所犯错误的数量进行了检查。假设质量保证计划将是可行的,可以实施并显着减少记录保存错误。使用客户记录QA保真度表计算了组内相关性,以检查评估者之间的可靠性,从而揭示有关单个错误的适度共识。单独的MANOVA表明,对于错误类型,QA和非QA记录之间存在显着差异,但对于基于特定记录形式的错误,则没有。具体而言,与非质量检查记录相比,质量检查记录显示的遗失表格和遗漏日期更少。独立样本的t检验表明,总错误率存在显着的组差异。因此,与非QA记录相比,QA记录显示的总错误更少。卡方分析还导致显着的组差异,表明质量检查记录比非质量检查记录更有条理。相关分析显示,质量检查审核的频率与缺失表格,缺失日期和总错误之间存在显着的负线性关系。因此,随着质量检查审核的增加,缺少表格的形式,日期和错误总数减少了。结果表明,当前的质量保证计划可能有助于减少错误并组织心理健康记录。本研究中使用的质量检查计划也被确定为具有成本效益和可行的,几乎不需要时间实施。当前的研究通过在基于社区的精神卫生机构内实施质量保证计划,对改善客户记录保持意义。

著录项

  • 作者

    Bradshaw Kelsey Michael;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 English
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号