首页> 外文OA文献 >Effects of weeds on yield and determination of economic thresholds for site-specific weed control using sensor technology
【2h】

Effects of weeds on yield and determination of economic thresholds for site-specific weed control using sensor technology

机译:杂草对产量的影响以及使用传感器技术确定特定地点杂草控制的经济阈值

摘要

Weeds can cause high yield losses. Knowledge about the weeds occurring, their distribution within fields and their effects on the crop yield is important to achieve effective weed control. The critical period for weed control (CPWC) and the economic threshold (ET) are important key concepts and management tools in weed control. While the former helps to time weed control in crops of low competitiveness, the latter provides a decision aid to determine whether weed control is necessary. This decision is generally taken at the field level.Weeds have been found to be distributed heterogeneously within fields. Site-specific weed control (SSWC) addresses this sub-field variation by determining weed distribution as input, by taking control decisions in the decision component and by providing control measures as output at high spatial resolution. Sensor systems for automated weed recognition were identified as prerequisite for SSWC since costs for scouting are too high. While experiences with SSWC using sensor data as input are still scarce, studies showed that considerable herbicide savings could be achieved with SSWC.ETs can serve as thresholds for the decision component in SSWC systems. However, the commonly used ETs were suggested decades ago and have not been updated to changing conditions since. The same is the case for the CPWC in maize in Germany. In addition, the approaches to determine the CPWC are usually not based on economic considerations, which are highly relevant to farmers. Thus, the objectives of this thesis are:1. To test different models and to provide a straightforward approach to integrate economical aspects in the concept of the CPWC for two weed control strategies: Herbicide based (Germany) and hoeing based (Benin); 2. To determine the effect of weeds on yield and to calculate ETs under current conditions which can be used for SSWC; 3. To evaluate the use of bi-spectral cameras and shape-based classification algorithms for weed detection in SSWC; and 4. To determine changes in weed frequencies, herbicide use and yield over the last 20 years in southwestern Germany. Datasets in maize from Germany and Benin served as input for the CPWC analyses. The log-logistic model was found to provide a similar fit as the commonly used models but its parameters are biologically meaningful. For Germany, analyses using a full cost model revealed that farmers should aim at applying herbicides early before the 4-leaf stage of maize.In Benin, where weed control is mainly done by hoeing, analyses showed that one well- timed weeding operation around the 10-leaf stage could already be cost-effective. A second weeding operation at a later stage would assure profit.The precision experimental design (PED) was employed to determine the effect of weeds, soil properties and herbicides on crop yield in three winter wheat trials. In this design, large field trials’ geodata of weed distribution, herbicide application, soil properties and yield are used to model the effects of the former three on yield. Galium aparine, other broadleaved weeds and Alopecurus myosuroides reduced yield by 17.5, 1.2 and 12.4 kg ha-1 plant-1 m2 determined by weed counts. The determined thresholds for SSWC with independently applied herbicides were 4, 48 and 12 plants m-2, respectively. Bi-spectral camera based weed–yield estimates were difficult to interpret showing that this technology still needs to be improved. However, large weed patches were correctly identified.ETs derived of field trials’ data carried out at several sites over 13 years in the framework of the ’Gemeinschaftsversuche Baden-Württemberg’ were 9.2-9.8 and 4.5-8.9 % absolute weed coverage for winter wheat and winter barley and 3.7% to 5.5% relative weed coverage for maize. Overall, the weed frequencies in winter cereals were found to be more stable than the weed frequencies in maize during the observation period. In maize, a frequency increase of thermophilic species was found. Trends of considerable yield increases of 0.16, 0.08 and 0.2 t ha-1 for winter wheat, winter barely and maize, respectively, were estimated if weeds were successfully controlled.In order to evaluate the use of bi-spectral cameras and shapebased classification algorithms for weed detection in SSWC, herbicides were applied site-specifically using weed densities determined by bi-spectral camera technology in a winter wheat and maize field. Threshold values were employed for decision taking. Using this approach herbicide savings between 58 and 83 % could be achieved. Such reductions in herbicide use would meet the demand of society to minimize the release of plant protection products in the environment. Misclassification occurred if weeds overlapped with crop plants and crop leaf tips were frequently misclassified as grass weeds. Improvements in equipment, especially between the interfaces of camera, classification algorithms, decision component and sprayer are advisable for further trials.In conclusion, the derived ETs can be easily implemented in a straightforward SSWC system or can serve as decision aid for farmers in winter wheat and winter barley. Further model testing and adjusting would be necessary. For maize, the use of ETs at the field level is not suggested by this study, however the need for early weed control is clearly demonstrated. Bi-spectral camera technology combined with classification algorithms to detect weeds is promising for research use and for SSWC, but still requires some technical improvements.
机译:杂草会导致高产损失。有关杂草的发生,它们在田间的分布及其对作物产量的影响的知识对于实现有效的杂草控制很重要。杂草控制的关键时期(CPWC)和经济阈值(ET)是杂草控制的重要关键概念和管理工具。前者有助于在低竞争力的作物上控制杂草的时间,而后者为确定是否需要除草提供了决策帮助。该决定通常在田间进行。已发现杂草在田间异质分布。特定地点的杂草控制(SSWC)通过将杂草分布确定为输入,通过在决策组件中进行控制决策以及以高空间分辨率提供控制措施作为输出来解决此子田间变化。由于侦察成本太高,用于杂草自动识别的传感器系统被确定为SSWC的前提。虽然仍然缺乏使用传感器数据作为输入的SSWC的经验,但研究表明,使用SSWC可以节省大量除草剂.ET可以作为SSWC系统中决策组件的阈值。但是,通常使用的ETs是在几十年前提出的,自那时以来还没有更新以适应不断变化的条件。德国玉米中的CPWC也是如此。此外,确定CPWC的方法通常不基于与农民高度相关的经济考虑。因此,本论文的目的是:1。为了测试不同的模型,并提供一种直接方法将经济方面纳入CPWC概念中的两种杂草控制策略:基于除草剂(德国)和)(贝宁); 2.确定杂草对产量的影响,并计算可用于SSWC的当前条件下的ETs; 3.评估双光谱相机和基于形状的分类算法在SSWC中杂草检测的使用; 4.确定德国西南部最近20年的杂草频率,除草剂使用和产量的变化。来自德国和贝宁的玉米数据集用作CPWC分析的输入。发现对数逻辑模型提供了与常用模型相似的拟合度,但是其参数具有生物学意义。在德国,使用全成本模型进行的分析表明,农民应该针对玉米四叶期之前的早期应用除草剂。在贝宁,杂草主要通过耕来控制,分析表明,在该地区进行了一次适时的除草操作。 10叶阶段可能已经具有成本效益。在随后的阶段进行第二次除草操作将确保收益。在三个冬小麦试验中,采用精密实验设计(PED)确定杂草,土壤特性和除草剂对作物产量的影响。在此设计中,使用了大田间试验的杂草分布,除草剂施用,土壤性质和产量的地理数据来模拟前三种对产量的影响。根据杂草计数确定,镓天冬氨酸,其他阔叶杂草和Aurocurus myosuroides使产量减少了17.5、1.2和12.4 kg ha-1植物-1 m2。使用独立施用的除草剂确定的SSWC的阈值分别为4、48和12株植物m-2。基于双光谱相机的杂草收率估算难以解释,表明该技术仍需改进。但是,正确识别出了大杂草斑块。在“ GemeinschaftsversucheBaden-Württemberg”框架下的13年中在多个地点进行的田间试验数据得出的ET的绝对杂草覆盖率为9.2-9.8和4.5-8.9%冬小麦和大麦的相对杂草覆盖率为3.7%至5.5%。总体而言,在观察期内,发现冬季谷物中的杂草频率比玉米中的杂草频率更稳定。在玉米中,嗜热菌种的频率增加。如果杂草得到了成功的控制,估计了冬小麦,裸冬和玉米的增产分别为0.16、0.08和0.2 t ha-1的趋势。为了评估使用双光谱相机和基于形状的分类算法SSWC中的杂草检测,除草剂是通过双光谱相机技术在冬小麦和玉米田中使用的杂草密度进行定点施用的。阈值被用于决策。使用这种方法,除草剂可节省58%至83%。这样减少除草剂的使用将满足社会的需求,以最大程度地减少植物保护产品在环境中的释放。如果杂草与农作物重叠并且农作物叶尖经常被误分类为草杂草,则会发生分类错误。建议对设备进行改进,特别是在摄像头,分类算法,决策组件和喷涂机的接口之间进行改进以进行进一步的试验。,导出的ET可以在简单的SSWC系统中轻松实现,也可以用作冬小麦和大麦种植者的决策辅助。进一步的模型测试和调整将是必要的。对于玉米,本研究未建议在田间使用ETs,但是清楚地表明了对早期除草的需求。双光谱相机技术与分类算法相结合以检测杂草对于研究用途和SSWC很有前途,但仍需要一些技术改进。

著录项

  • 作者

    Keller Martina;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号