首页> 外文OA文献 >Determinants and Impacts of Demand-side Management Program Investment of Electric Utilities
【2h】

Determinants and Impacts of Demand-side Management Program Investment of Electric Utilities

机译:电力企业需求侧管理项目投资的决定因素及影响

摘要

From the late seventies through the early 1990u27s electric utilities were facing many different forces that caused them to invest into demand-side management programs (DSM). Roots of the growth of DSM can be found in the high inflation and energy price shocks of the late seventies and early eighties, spiraling building costs of generation, safety and environmental concerns, increased costs of new capacity with possible exhaustion of scale economies, unexpected high elasticity in the demand for electricity, and public utility commissions that sought alternatives to the resulting high rate increases. This study develops and estimates four equations that look at the more aggregate utility level impacts of DSM. The goal of two equations is to determine what factors influence utility investments in DSM and if stock market investment in utilities is affected by DSM. Two additional equations are developed to determine system level impacts of DSM on cost of and quantity demanded of electricity. To estimate these models four years of annual data were collected for 81 utilities spanning 1990-1993. These utilities have sold over 60% of all the electricity in the US and were responsible for over 80% the national spending in DSM. The DSM investment model indicated that of the major variance in DSM investment is due to the utilityu27s regulatory environment. Both an above average regulatory climate and least-cost planning requirements had major impacts on the level of DSM investment. The cost of equity capital equation revealed that DSM expenditures had a positive impact on the valuation of utilityu27s stock. Cost and quantity equations were estimated both individually and simultaneously. DSM expenditures seemed to have a negative impact on both average cost and quantity demanded. Although these relationships were statistically significant, the impacts were quite small. To summarize; the regulatory environment seems to have the strongest impact on the level of DSM investment; DSM spending was associated with an increased stock valuation; as expected DSM investments were found to have a negative relationship with quantity demanded; and finally DSM investment appeared to reduce the average cost.
机译:从七十年代后期到1990年代初,电力公司面临着许多不同的力量,促使他们投资于需求方管理计划(DSM)。帝斯曼(DSM)增长的根源可以追溯到七十年代末和八十年代初的高通胀和能源价格冲击,发电的建筑成本,安全和环境问题激增,新产能的成本增加,规模经济可能用尽,意外高电力需求具有弹性,公共事业委员会寻求替代方案来代替由此带来的高费率增长。这项研究开发并估计了四个方程,这些方程着眼于DSM对综合公用事业水平的影响。两个方程式的目的是确定哪些因素会影响DSM中的公用事业投资以及DSM是否会影响公用事业中的股票市场投资。开发了两个附加方程式,以确定DSM对电成本和所需电量的系统级影响。为了估计这些模型,收集了1990-1993年间81家公用事业公司的四年年度数据。这些公用事业公司在美国售出了超过60%的电力,占DSM全国支出的80%以上。 DSM投资模型表明,DSM投资的主要差异在于公用事业的监管环境。高于平均水平的法规环境和最低成本的计划要求都对DSM投资水平产生了重大影响。权益资本成本等式表明,帝斯曼的支出对公用事业公司的股票价值具有积极影响。成本和数量方程是分别和同时估计的。 DSM支出似乎对平均成本和所需数量都有负面影响。尽管这些关系在统计上很重要,但影响很小。总结监管环境似乎对DSM投资水平的影响最大; DSM支出与股票估值提高有关;如预期的那样,帝斯曼的投资与需求量之间存在负相关关系;最后,帝斯曼投资似乎降低了平均成本。

著录项

  • 作者

    Degens Philipp;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1996
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号