首页> 外文OA文献 >Factors in assessing effectiveness of orientation programs for public welfare caseworkers; a group project
【2h】

Factors in assessing effectiveness of orientation programs for public welfare caseworkers; a group project

机译:评估公益案件工作者入职培训计划有效性的因素;一个小组项目

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A study done in 1968-1969 by students at Portland State University School of Social Work at the request of the Oregon State Public Welfare Commission Staff Development Division sought to devise an instrument for assessing the effectiveness of teaching the casework principles of Felix P. Biestek to casework trainees :in the public welfareu27s orientation program. The test instrument developed was found to have low, but acceptable, internal reliability. Building en the previous yearu27s work, this 1969-1970 study sought to determine the validity of the test instrument by relating test scores to two measures of job performance, namely the latest supervisory civil service rating and a self-rating. Data was collected on thirty of the original test group. The test instrument was determined to be invalid on the basis of these assessments which used measures of total job performance as validating criteria. The study group concluded that the instrument should not be used by itself to determine the effectiveness of teaching casework principles to caseworkers in a public welfare orientation program. While the instrument was being tested, it was recognized that orientation training covers more than just Biestek’s casework principles. Other types of knowledge are also needed for caseworkers to perform effectively on their jobs. Consequently, the scope of the project was enlarged to include an exploration of other factors in caseworker development during orientation. To explore other factors, two instruments were used. One was a questionnaire developed by the group to obtain background information and to measure some attitudes of the caseworker toward his job and the welfare agency. The second was an instrument borrowed from the Oregon State Fish Commission for determining job satisfaction attitudes. The findings of the questionnaire indicated that informal training and supervision were important in caseworker development. The importance of supervision was reinforced by responses given to the survey of job satisfaction attitudes. The survey elicited complaints about bureaucratic agencies, i.e., the red tape, little use or trying of innovative methods, and poor communications within the agency and to the public. In view of the findings, the study group made six recommendations to the Oregon State Public Welfare Division regarding their orientation and staff development program. The study conclusions state that further research is needed (1) to define the casework job and then develop a test to measure a worker’s competency; (2) to develop tools to determine the social work attitudes, knowledge, and skills of the bachelor level service worker; and (3) to investigate use of the structured versus unstructured situation for teaching new caseworkers.
机译:1968年至1969年,应俄勒冈州公共福利委员会员工发展部的要求,波特兰州立大学社会工作学院的学生完成了一项研究,旨在设计一种评估Felix P. Biestek案例研究原则教学效果的工具。案例研究学员:在公益指导课程中。发现开发的测试仪器具有较低但可接受的内部可靠性。在前一年的工作基础上,这项1969-1970年的研究试图通过将考试成绩与两项工作绩效衡量标准相关联,以确定考试工具的有效性,这两项指标是最新的公务员监督等级和自我评估。收集了原始测试组中三十个的数据。根据这些评估,该测试仪器被认为是无效的,这些评估使用总工作表现的度量作为验证标准。研究小组的结论是,不应在公共福利导向计划中单独使用该工具来确定向案例工作者讲授案例工作原理的有效性。在测试该仪器时,人们认识到定向培训不仅涵盖Biestek的案例工作原则。案例工作者还需要其他类型的知识来有效地完成工作。因此,该项目的范围扩大了,以包括在入职培训期间对案例工作者发展的其他因素的探索。为了探索其他因素,使用了两种工具。一个是由该小组开发的问卷,用于获取背景信息并衡量案例工作者对其工作和福利机构的某些态度。第二个是从俄勒冈州鱼类委员会借来的工具,用于确定工作满意度。问卷调查的结果表明,非正式培训和监督对于案例工作者的发展很重要。对工作满意度态度调查的答复加强了监督的重要性。这项调查引起了对官僚机构的抱怨,即繁文tape节,创新方法很少使用或尝试,机构内部与公众之间的沟通不畅。根据调查结果,研究组向俄勒冈州公共福利部提出了六项建议,涉及其方向和人员发展计划。研究结论指出,需要进一步的研究(1)定义案例工作,然后开发测试以衡量工人的能力; (2)开发工具以确定学士学位服务人员的社会工作态度,知识和技能; (3)研究如何利用结构化和非结构化的情境来教导新的案例工作者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号