首页> 外文OA文献 >The Effects of Airline Deregulation on Airline Safety: An Econometric Analysis
【2h】

The Effects of Airline Deregulation on Airline Safety: An Econometric Analysis

机译:航空公司放松管制对航空公司安全的影响:计量经济学分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

After an unfortunate series of accidents in the mid 1930’s the Air Transport Association (ATA) lobbied Congress for regulation of the industry. The ATA claimed that unfair competition was endangering the public safety. The Civil Aeronautics Act of 1938 created the Civil Aeronautics Board (CAB) and gave the CAB the authority to regulate the industry. During the regulation era airline ridership increased and safety improved. During the regulation period, opportunity for comparing the safety record of the regulated industry with the record of the unregulated portions of the industry was limited. The few attempts made rendered inconclusive results. During a period of high inflation and high interest rates in the 1970’s interest in deregulating the airlines arose. With passage of the Airline Deregulation Act of 1978, interest in the effects of regulation on airline safety was renewed. More than a decade has passed since deregulation. The industry has continued to improve its safety record during the deregulation period. The question remains: u22How has deregulation affected airline safety?u22 In this study records of airline accidents and incidents investigated by the National Transportation Safety Board are examined. The occurrences are divided into those with causes that are under the airlines control and those that are not under their control. Those under the airlines control are regressed against time and a dummy variable for deregulation. The possible effects of airline profitability on the results are also explored. The results indicate that deregulation had an adverse effect on airline safety. The effects of alternative formulations are also examined. The effect though statistically significant is small. It does not suggest the need to return to a regulated airline industry. But, it does suggest the need for additional research into the connection between airline safety and competition.
机译:在1930年中期发生了一系列不幸的事故之后,美国航空运输协会(ATA)游说国会对航空业进行监管。 ATA声称不正当竞争正在危害公共安全。 1938年的《民用航空法》创建了民用航空委员会(CAB),并赋予CAB监管该行业的权力。在管制时期,航空乘客增加,安全性得到改善。在监管期间,用于将受监管行业的安全记录与该行业不受监管部分的记录进行比较的机会有限。几次尝试都没有定论。在通货膨胀率高和利率高的时期,1970年人们开始放宽对航空公司的管制。随着1978年《航空管制放松法案》的通过,人们对管制对航空安全的影响重新引起了人们的兴趣。自放松管制以来已经过去了十多年。在放松管制期间,该行业一直在改善其安全记录。问题仍然存在:放松管制对航空公司的安全有何影响?在本研究中,研究了由美国国家运输安全委员会调查的航空事故和事故征候的记录。这些事件分为那些原因在航空公司控制之下的事件和那些不在其控制之下的事件。那些受航空公司控制的飞机会根据时间和虚拟变量进行回归,以放松管制。还探讨了航空公司盈利能力对结果的可能影响。结果表明,放松管制对航空公司的安全有不利影响。还检查了替代制剂的作用。尽管具有统计学意义,但影响很小。它并不表示需要重返受管制的航空业。但是,这确实表明需要对航空公司安全与竞争之间的联系进行更多研究。

著录项

  • 作者

    De Jager William Charles;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1993
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号