This legal writing titled “The Judge Consideration Principle in PronouncingudDeath Sentence Towards Narcotics Criminal Actors” aimed to obtain data on deadudsentence due to narcotics criminal acts and to know what principles used by theudjudges to pronounce dead sentence towards narcotics criminal actors and whetheruddead sentence pronounced by the judges to narcotics criminal actors had beenudsuitable. This was a normative law research by observing literature material thatudwas a secondary data. Data source used in this research was secondary dataudsourced from primary and secondary law materials. Data collection method wasudby literature study and interview. Data analysis method was qualitative conductedudby comprehending, composing or examining data that was collectedudsystematically. Even though narcotics was useful and necessary to treatment andudhealth service, however, if misused or it was not used as treatment standard, orudeven narcotics was distributed in dark market would cause disadvantageous resultudboth individually as well as collectively, especially for the young people.udTherefore, violation on narcotics regulations could be threatened by highest andudheaviest criminal acts and was possibly condemned maximally i.e. death sentenceudbesides prison criminal and penalty criminal. The principles used by the judges toudpronounce the dead sentence towards narcotics criminal actors was due toudlegislation threatened death sentence in some articles and dead sentence wasudconsidered as one way to cut dark narcotics distribution chain. Dead sentence toudthe narcotics criminal actors only met community protection aspect and it has notudmet individual protection aspect.
展开▼
