首页> 外文OA文献 >Q methodology and a Delphi poll: a useful approach to researching a narrative approach to therapy
【2h】

Q methodology and a Delphi poll: a useful approach to researching a narrative approach to therapy

机译:Q方法和Delphi民意调查:研究叙事治疗方法的有用方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Q methodology and a Delphi poll combined qualitative and quantitative methods to explore definitions of White and Epston's (1990) narrative approach to therapy among a group of UK practitioners. A Delphi poll was used to generate statements about narrative therapy. The piloting of statements by the Delphi panel identified agreement about theoretical ideas underpinning narrative therapy and certain key practices. A wider group of practitioners ranked the statements in a Q sort and made qualitative comments about their sorting. Quantitative methods (principal components analysis) were used to extract eight accounts of narrative therapy, five of which are qualitatively analysed in this paper. Agreement and differences were identified across a range of issues, including the social construction of narratives, privileging a political stance or narrative techniques and the relationship with other therapies, specifically systemic psychotherapy. Q methodology, combined with the Delphi poll, was a unique and innovative feature of this study.
机译:Q方法学和德尔福民意测验结合了定性和定量方法,以探索怀特和爱普斯顿(1990)叙述性治疗方法在一组英国从业者中的定义。 Delphi民意测验用于产生有关叙事疗法的陈述。德尔菲小组对声明的试点确定了关于支持叙事治疗的理论思想和某些关键实践的共识。更大范围的从业者将陈述按Q排序进行排序,并对其排序进行定性评论。定量方法(主要成分分析)用于提取八个叙述性治疗方法,其中五个定性分析。在一系列问题上确定了共识和分歧,包括叙事的社会建构,赋予政治立场或叙事技巧以特权以及与其他疗法的关系,特别是系统性心理疗法。 Q方法与Delphi民意测验相结合,是这项研究的独特创新之处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号