首页> 外文OA文献 >The pivotal role of effort beliefs in mediating implicit theories of intelligence and achievement goals academic motivations
【2h】

The pivotal role of effort beliefs in mediating implicit theories of intelligence and achievement goals academic motivations

机译:努力信念在调解智力,成就目标和学术动机的隐含理论中的关键作用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Empirical studies into meaning systems surrounding implicit theories of intelligence typically entail two stringent assumptions: that different implicit theories and different effort beliefs represent opposite poles on a single scale, and that implicit theories directly impact the constructs as achievement goals and academic motivations. Through an empirical study based on a large sample of university students, we aim to demonstrate that relaxing these stringent assumptions, and thereby using the meaning system framework to its full potential, will provide strong benefits: effort beliefs are crucial mediators of relationships between implicit theories and achievement goals and academic motivations, and the different poles of implicit theories and effort beliefs do expose different relationships with goal setting behaviour and academic motivations. A structural equation model, cross-validated by demonstrating gender-invariance of path coefficients, demonstrates that incremental and entity theory views have less predictive power than positive and negative effort beliefs in explaining achievement goals and motivations.
机译:对围绕智力隐含理论的意义系统进行的实证研究通常需要两个严格的假设:不同的隐含理论和不同的努力信念在单一尺度上代表相反的两极,隐含理论直接影响作为成就目标和学术动机的建构。通过基于大量大学生样本的实证研究,我们旨在证明放松这些严格的假设,从而充分利用意义系统框架的潜力,将提供巨大的好处:努力信念是内隐理论之间关系的关键中介者成就目标和学术动机,以及内隐理论和努力信念的不同方面,确实暴露了与目标设定行为和学术动机的不同关系。通过证明路径系数的性别不变性来交叉验证的结构方程模型表明,在解释成就目标和动机时,增量和实体理论视图的预测能力要比积极努力和消极努力的信念低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号