首页> 外文OA文献 >Accuracy and consistency of grass pollen identification by human analysts using electron micrographs of surface ornamentation
【2h】

Accuracy and consistency of grass pollen identification by human analysts using electron micrographs of surface ornamentation

机译:人类分析师利用表面纹饰电子显微镜鉴定草花粉的准确性和一致性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

• Premise of the study: Humans frequently identify pollen grains at a taxonomic rank above species. Grass pollen is a classic case of this situation, which has led to the development of computational methods for identifying grass pollen species. This paper aims to provide context for these computational methods by quantifying the accuracy and consistency of human identification.udud• Methods: We measured the ability of nine human analysts to identify 12 species of grass pollen using scanning electron microscopy images. These are the same images that were used in computational identifications. We have measured the coverage, accuracy, and consistency of each analyst, and investigated their ability to recognize duplicate images.udud• Results: Coverage ranged from 87.5% to 100%. Mean identification accuracy ranged from 46.67% to 87.5%. The identification consistency of each analyst ranged from 32.5% to 87.5%, and each of the nine analysts produced considerably different identification schemes. The proportion of duplicate image pairs that were missed ranged from 6.25% to 58.33%.udud• Discussion: The identification errors made by each analyst, which result in a decline in accuracy and consistency, are likely related to psychological factors such as the limited capacity of human memory, fatigue and boredom, recency effects, and positivity bias.
机译:•研究的前提:人类经常识别出比物种更易分类的花粉粒。草花粉是这种情况的典型案例,这导致了用于确定草花粉种类的计算方法的发展。本文旨在通过量化人类识别的准确性和一致性来为这些计算方法提供背景。 ud ud•方法:我们使用扫描电子显微镜图像,测量了9位人类分析人员识别12种草粉的能力。这些是在计算识别中使用的相同图像。我们已经测量了每个分析师的覆盖率,准确性和一致性,并调查了他们识别重复图像的能力。 ud ud•结果:覆盖率从87.5%到100%不等。平均识别准确度在46.67%至87.5%之间。每个分析师的识别一致性在32.5%到87.5%之间,并且九位分析师中的每一个都产生了截然不同的识别方案。遗漏的重复图像对的比例在6.25%至58.33%之间。 ud ud•讨论:每个分析人员的识别错误都会导致准确性和一致性下降,可能与心理因素有关,例如人类记忆的能力有限,疲劳和无聊,新近度影响和积极性偏见。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号