首页> 外文OA文献 >Raising the bar? Thoughts on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office. CEPS Policy Insights No 2017/39, 30 November 2017
【2h】

Raising the bar? Thoughts on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office. CEPS Policy Insights No 2017/39, 30 November 2017

机译:提高标准?关于设立欧洲检察院的思考。 CEps政策见解2017年11月30日2017/39号

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

After almost four years of negotiation and 20 years of academic and political debate, the CouncilRegulation setting up the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) was approved in October 2017, inthe framework of the enhanced cooperation established in April 2017. The creation of a Europeanprosecuting authority is a historic achievement for the European Union, especially when a wave ofpopulism – as epitomised by Brexit – has undermined the process of integration.The EPPO Regulation is probably the most ambitious instrument of EU law adopted so far, since itcreates the first EU body with direct powers regarding individuals in the field of criminal law. The Officewill be empowered to investigate and prosecute crimes affecting the financial interests of the EU.Recent calls, including those from Commission President Juncker and French President Macron, for anextension of the EPPO’s powers to cases of cross-border terrorism bode well for the likely acceptanceof this Office in the EU in the years to come. Yet the final text of the Regulation raises several concerns,such as those relating to the impact of supranational investigations on human rights and, moregenerally, about the expected effectiveness of the Office, given its cumbersome and multi-layeredarchitecture.This paper looks at the main provisions of the Regulation and the challenges it poses, focusing on thestructure, powers, and competence of the EPPO. It also considers the judicial review of its acts, theprotection of the rights of suspects and accused persons, and relations between the Office and itspartners. The analysis shows that the Commission’s innovative vision of a centralised prosecution at EUlevel, with its echoes of federalism, has been watered down in negotiations in the Council and replacedwith the usual intergovernmental, collegiate vision that underpins numerous EU judicial cooperationstructures and instruments.
机译:经过近四年的谈判和20年的学术和政治辩论,在2017年4月建立的加强合作框架内,于2017年10月批准了建立欧洲检察官办公室(EPPO)的理事会法规。建立了欧洲检察机关这是欧盟的一项历史性成就,尤其是当一波民粹主义浪潮(以英国退欧为代表)破坏了一体化进程时。EPPO法规可能是迄今为止通过的欧盟法律中最雄心勃勃的工具,因为它创建了第一个具有在刑法领域对个人的直接权力。该办公室将有权调查和起诉影响欧盟金融利益的犯罪。包括欧盟委员会主席容克和法国总统马克龙在内的最近呼吁,将欧洲专利局的权力扩展到跨境恐怖主义案件,预示着可能接受未来几年,该办事处将在欧盟成立。然而,《条例》的最后案文引起了一些关注,例如与超国家调查对人权的影响有关,并且更普遍的是,鉴于该办公室繁琐而多层的架构,该办公室的预期效力。该法规的规定及其带来的挑战,着重于EPPO的结构,权力和能力。它还考虑对其行为的司法审查,对嫌疑人和被告人权利的保护以及该办公室与其伙伴之间的关系。分析表明,委员会在欧盟一级进行集中起诉的创新构想及其对联邦制的呼应已经在安理会的谈判中被淡化,并被支持众多欧盟司法合作结构和文书的通常的政府间合议构想取代。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号