首页> 外文OA文献 >Bank versus non-bank credit in the United States, Europe and China. Bruegel Policy Contribution, 2012/07, 5 June 2013
【2h】

Bank versus non-bank credit in the United States, Europe and China. Bruegel Policy Contribution, 2012/07, 5 June 2013

机译:美国,欧洲和中国的银行与非银行信贷。 Bruegel政策贡献,2012/07,2013年6月5日

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In the wake of recent crisis developments in the US and Europe, non-bank credit channels have often been portrayed as 'shadow banking' and have been considered primarily through the lens of the risks they may pose to financial stability.However, the debate about financial system structures remains immature, in large part due to lack of reliable and comparable data.The available evidence actually points towards a correlation between the development of non-bank credit and higher resilience against systemic risk, at least in developed economies. Policy should aim at better statistical information, and at strengthening the infrastructure for the gradual development of sustainable nonbank credit provision.
机译:随着美国和欧洲最近危机的发展,非银行信贷渠道通常被描述为``影子银行'',并且主要是从它们可能对金融稳定构成风险的角度来考虑的。金融体系的结构仍然不成熟,这在很大程度上是由于缺乏可靠和可比的数据。现有证据实际上指出,至少在发达经济体中,非银行信贷的发展与抵御系统风险的较高抵御能力之间存在相关性。政策应着眼于更好的统计信息,并加强基础设施,以逐步发展可持续的非银行信贷提供。

著录项

  • 作者

    Veron Nicolas.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号