首页> 外文OA文献 >Central Banks in Times of Crisis: The FED vs. the ECB. CEPS Policy Brief No. 276, 11 July 2012,
【2h】

Central Banks in Times of Crisis: The FED vs. the ECB. CEPS Policy Brief No. 276, 11 July 2012,

机译:危机时期的中央银行:美联储与欧洲央行。 CEps政策简报第276号,2012年7月11日,

摘要

Different economic and financial structures require different crisis responses. Different crises also require different tools and resources. The first ‘stage’ of the financial crisis (2007-09) was similar on both sides of the Atlantic, and the response was also quite similar. The second stage of the crisis is unique to the euro area. Increasing financial disintegration within the region has forced the ECB to become the central counterparty for the entire cross-border banking market and to intervene in the sovereign bond market of some stressed countries. The actions undertaken by the European Central Bank (ECB), however, have not always represented the best response, in terms of effectiveness, consistency and transparency. This is especially true for the Securities Markets Programme (SMP): by de facto imposing its absolute seniority during the Greek PSI (private sector involvement), the ECB has probably killed its future effectiveness.
机译:不同的经济和金融结构需要不同的危机应对措施。不同的危机也需要不同的工具和资源。金融危机的第一个“阶段”(2007-09年)在大西洋两岸都相似,而且应对措施也非常相似。危机的第二阶段是欧元区独有的。该地区内部越来越多的金融解体迫使欧洲央行成为整个跨境银行市场的主要交易对手,并干预了一些压力较大的国家的主权债券市场。然而,就有效性,一致性和透明度而言,欧洲中央银行(ECB)采取的行动并不总是最好的回应。对于证券市场计划(SMP)而言尤其如此:通过在希腊的PSI(私营部门参与)中实际上施加其绝对的资历,欧洲央行可能已经失去了其未来的效力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号