首页> 外文OA文献 >The European Union and Security Sector Reform in Africa: a Leader in Theory, a Laggard in Reality? Bruges Regional Integration Global Governance Paper 1/2009
【2h】

The European Union and Security Sector Reform in Africa: a Leader in Theory, a Laggard in Reality? Bruges Regional Integration Global Governance Paper 1/2009

机译:欧洲联盟和非洲安全部门改革:理论领袖,现实中的落后者?布鲁日区域一体化与全球治理文件1/2009

摘要

The nature of security challenges in Africa being inextricably linked with a deficient security sector, Security Sector Reform (SSR) emerged as a relevant concept to address security and governance issues at the same time. In this context, the European Union (EU) emphasised in its discourse the need to reinforce the link between security and development to meet the objectives of peace, security and stability in Africa. Compared to states and international organisations, the EU can be considered a priori as a leader in the field of SSR. First, it has a wide range of policy instruments at its disposal covering the whole spectrum of SSR (army, police, justice, good governance). Second, the EU sustains a ‘post-modern’ approach based on security through transparency and interdependence, which allows it to overcome the traditional bilateral state relations.In view of this comparative advantage in theory, the main question addressed in this paper is whether the EU actually is a leader in practice in promoting SSR in Africa through a coherent use of its policy instruments. A close analysis of the EU’s engagement in the Democratic Republic of Congo and in Guinea-Bissau will reveal numerous impediments, regarding inter- and intra-pillar coordination as well as a lack of political commitment, preventing the EU from dealing comprehensively with SSR. The EU’s approach is also constrained by the fact that enforcing a ‘post-modern’ rationale in ‘pre-modern’ states is perilous when the recipient state is unstable or unwilling to implement a reform process.Hence, the EU is still a laggard or an actor ‘in the making’ in the field of SSR. It lacks greater coherence and consistency between its policy instruments, mainly because of its fragmented pillar system based on separate competences between the Community (first pillar) and the Council (second pillar) which created a gap between a development and a security-oriented community. It also needs stronger political commitment from the Member States in order to operationalise the SSR concept, notably by supporting more intensively EU SSR missions in Africa. Overall, the EU needs to elaborate one strategic vision (something that the Lisbon Treaty, if ever ratified, could contribute to achieve) in order to overcome its theoretical, institutional and political obstacles.
机译:由于非洲安全挑战的本质与安全部门不足密不可分,安全部门改革(SSR)应运而生,成为同时解决安全和治理问题的相关概念。在这方面,欧洲联盟(欧盟)在其讲话中强调必须加强安全与发展之间的联系,以实现非洲的和平,安全与稳定的目标。与各州和国际组织相比,可以认为欧盟是SSR领域的先驱。首先,它拥有广泛的政策工具,涵盖了SSR的所有领域(军队,警察,司法,善政)。其次,欧盟通过透明和相互依存维持基于安全的“后现代”方法,从而使其能够克服传统的双边国家关系。鉴于这种比较优势,从理论上讲,本文要解决的主要问题是欧盟实际上是通过一致使用其政策手段在非洲推广SSR的实践中的领导者。对欧盟在刚果民主共和国和几内亚比绍的交往进行的仔细分析将发现,在柱间和柱内协调以及缺乏政治承诺方面存在许多障碍,使欧盟无法全面处理SSR。欧盟的做法还受到以下事实的制约:在受援国不稳定或不愿实施改革进程的情况下,在``前现代''国家中强制执行``后现代''理论是危险的,因此,欧盟仍然落后或落后SSR领域中“正在制造”的演员。它在其政策工具之间缺乏更大的连贯性和一致性,这主要是因为其支离破碎的支柱体系是建立在共同体(第一支柱)和安理会(第二支柱)之间独立权限的基础上的,这在发展与面向安全的社区之间造成了差距。为了实施SSR概念,特别是通过更密集地支持欧盟SSR在非洲的访问,它还需要成员国做出更大的政治承诺。总体而言,欧盟需要阐述一种战略远景(如果《里斯本条约》得到批准,将有助于实现这一目标),以克服其理论,体制和政治障碍。

著录项

  • 作者

    Weiler Quentin;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2009
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号