首页> 外文OA文献 >Proportionality overrides unlimited surveillance. The German Constitutional Court Judgment on data retention. CEPS Liberty and Security in Europe, May 18, 2010
【2h】

Proportionality overrides unlimited surveillance. The German Constitutional Court Judgment on data retention. CEPS Liberty and Security in Europe, May 18, 2010

机译:比例优先于无限制的监视。德国宪法法院对数据保留的判决。 CEps自由与安全在欧洲,2010年5月18日

摘要

The Data Retention Directive, demanding the retention of telecommunications data for a period of six months up to two years, was adopted on 15 March 2006. Since then, this seemingly straightforward directive has generated quite an impressive number of court judgments. They range from the European Court of Justice (ECJ) to the administrative (e.g. Germany and Bulgaria) and constitutional courts (e.g. Romania) of some member states. It is the judgment of the German Constitutional Court, delivered on 2 March 2010, which has particularly caught the attention of commentators: civil society, lawyers, journalists and politicians. In the judgment, the court says ‘No’ to the German implementation laws of the Data Retention Directive. This paper highlights some of the key features of the ruling and its main similarities and divergences with similar judgments. Given the relevance of the issues at stake, the judgment is then contextualized in the wider framework of EU data processing and protection debates, offering elements of reflection for further discussion.
机译:《数据保留指令》于2006年3月15日获得通过,要求将电信数据保留六个月至两年。此后,这一看似简单的指令引起了相当多的法院判决。它们的范围从欧洲法院(ECJ)到某些成员国的行政法院(例如德国和保加利亚)和宪法法院(例如罗马尼亚)。这是德国宪法法院于2010年3月2日作出的判决,该判决尤其引起了评论员的关注:民间社会,律师,新闻工作者和政治家。在判决中,法院对“数据保留指令”的德国实施法表示“否”。本文重点介绍了该裁决的一些关键特征,以及该裁决的主要相似点和不同之处。鉴于所涉问题的相关性,该判决随后在欧盟数据处理和保护辩论的更广泛框架中进行了背景分析,为进一步的讨论提供了反思的元素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号