首页> 外文OA文献 >Forging the ties that bind: Comparing the factors behind electricity market integration in the EU and ASEAN. EU Centre Working Paper No. 6, May 2012
【2h】

Forging the ties that bind: Comparing the factors behind electricity market integration in the EU and ASEAN. EU Centre Working Paper No. 6, May 2012

机译:打造束缚关系:比较欧盟和东盟电力市场一体化背后的因素。欧盟中心第6号工作文件,2012年5月

摘要

This paper examines the political forces that drive electricity grid expansion in the European Union (EU) and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). Although there are a number of short-term political and economic barriers to electricity market integration, there are also compelling economic, environmental and energy security benefits of establishing large-scale and dynamic electricity markets in the long-term. By considering the conceptually unique aspects of the incentives for regional electricity market integration in the EU and ASEAN, the contrast in progress made in establishing regional electricity markets in the two regions is explained. The most important factor accounting for this difference is the fact that there are contrasting energy scenes in the EU and ASEAN. Being a single market consisting predominantly of net energy consumers, and with institutions at the European level to coordinate the decision making process on energy matters, it is relatively easy for the EU to pursue efforts in electricity market integration. In ASEAN, the existence of both energy importers and exporters within the same regional forum makes the establishment of a regional energy grid, which has the ability to increase the production of renewable energy in Southeast Asia much more complex. Moreover, concerns regarding the loss of national sovereignty are a further factor that continues to hamper ASEAN efforts to establish an effective regional electricity market in ASEAN. As the EU member states have already pooled a degree of their sovereignty, and in particular since the Lisbon Treaty made energy a core competency of the European institutions, significant resistance to external intervention in national affairs has largely been avoided.
机译:本文研究了推动欧盟(EU)和东南亚国家联盟(ASEAN)电网扩张的政治力量。尽管在电力市场整合方面存在许多短期的政治和经济障碍,但从长远来看,建立大规模的动态电力市场也具有令人信服的经济,环境和能源安全优势。通过考虑欧盟和东盟地区电力市场一体化激励措施的概念上独特的方面,解释了在两个地区建立地区电力市场方面取得的进展的对比。造成这种差异的最重要因素是,欧盟和东盟的能源形势截然相反。作为主要由净能源消费者组成的单一市场,并且与欧洲一级的机构协调能源问题的决策过程,欧盟在电力市场一体化方面进行努力相对容易。在东盟,能源进口商和​​出口商在同一个区域论坛中的存在使区域能源网的建立变得更加复杂,该电网具有增加东南亚可再生能源生产的能力。此外,对丧失国家主权的担忧是继续阻碍东盟在东盟建立有效的区域电力市场的努力的另一个因素。由于欧盟成员国已经集中了一定程度的主权,尤其是自《里斯本条约》将能源作为欧洲机构的核心能力以来,很大程度上避免了对外部干预国家事务的强烈抵抗。

著录项

  • 作者

    Boëthius Gustav;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类
  • 入库时间 2022-08-20 21:04:47

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号