首页> 外文OA文献 >Europeanizing Healthcare: Cross-border Patient Mobility and Its Consequences for the German and Danish Healthcare Systems. Bruges Political Research Paper No. 7, May 2008
【2h】

Europeanizing Healthcare: Cross-border Patient Mobility and Its Consequences for the German and Danish Healthcare Systems. Bruges Political Research Paper No. 7, May 2008

机译:欧洲医疗保健:跨境患者流动及其对德国和丹麦医疗保健系统的后果。布鲁日政治研究论文第7号,2008年5月

摘要

Member States have been trying to shield their welfare systems from European integration. Yet, as the recent European Court of Justice’s ruling on the Watts case has shown, Member States’ healthcare systems have to comply with the fundamental principles of the European Single Market. The obstacles to undergo non-emergency medical treatment in other Member States have been significantly reduced for European citizens. This paper analyzes how Member States’ healthcare systems have been affected by the development of European cross-border patient mobility using the concept of Europeanization. Drawing on Historical Institutionalism, it is argued that a process of institutional adaptation will occur in which the pace and the scale of the transposition of European legislation to domestic legislation depend on its fit with existing domestic institutions. Depending on their institutional set-ups, Germany’s social insurance system will show a lower degree of institutional misfit than Denmark’s national health system. Therefore Germany will try to upload different policy preferences to the European level than Denmark in order to lower the costs of their institutional adaptation to European obligations. It turns out that national health systems show a higher institutional misfit than social insurance systems: the costs of institutional adaptation are much higher for Denmark than for Germany. Hence, Denmark has been slower in transposing European legislation into national law than Germany. Conversely, Germany tries to upload different policy preferences to the European level than Denmark in order to lower the costs of their institutional adaptation to European obligations. The political preferences and interests that the Member States are trying to upload differ as much as their adaptive pressures. A restrictive interpretation of the Court’s jurisprudence is of much more importance to Denmark than to Germany, as Germany just tries to avoid further adaptive pressures.
机译:会员国一直在努力使其福利制度免受欧洲一体化的影响。但是,正如最近欧洲法院对Watts案的裁决所表明的那样,成员国的医疗保健系统必须遵守欧洲单一市场的基本原则。对于欧洲公民而言,在其他成员国接受非紧急医疗的障碍已大大减少。本文使用欧洲化的概念分析了欧洲跨境患者流动性发展如何影响会员国的医疗体系。有人认为,利用历史制度主义,将会发生一种制度适应的过程,其中,欧洲立法向国内立法过渡的速度和规模取决于其与现有国内制度的契合度。根据其机构设置,德国的社会保险体系会比丹麦的国家卫生体系显示出较低的机构不当程度。因此,德国将尝试向欧洲上载与丹麦不同的政策优惠,以降低其机构适应欧洲义务的成本。事实证明,国家卫生系统显示出比社会保险系统更高的制度失调:丹麦的制度适应成本要比德国高得多。因此,与德国相比,丹麦在将欧洲立法转变为国家法律方面进展缓慢。相反,德国试图向欧洲上载与丹麦不同的政策优惠,以降低其机构适应欧洲义务的成本。会员国试图上载的政治偏好和利益与其适应压力一样大。对德国而言,对法院判例的限制性解释比对德国更重要,因为德国只是在努力避免进一步的适应性压力。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kostera Thomas.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2008
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号