首页> 外文OA文献 >The Health Check: Further Steps to Adapt the Common Agricultural Policy to New Realities. Egmont European Affairs Program Working Paper 2009/01
【2h】

The Health Check: Further Steps to Adapt the Common Agricultural Policy to New Realities. Egmont European Affairs Program Working Paper 2009/01

机译:健康检查:使共同农业政策适应新现实的进一步措施。埃格蒙特欧洲事务计划工作文件2009/01

摘要

The Health Check (HC) of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) was launched in November 2007 and concluded at the end of 2008. The European Commission presented it as an evaluation of the 2003 CAP reforms1 addressing three specific issues. It sought to streamline the Single Payment Scheme (SPS), improve the market orientation of the CAP and provide adequate policy tools for new challenges. The scope of this Working Paper is to give a comprehensive overview of the adopted measures. Therefore, some of the initial proposals will be compared with what is finally agreed upon, while elucidating some of the dynamics of the legislative process, such as climate change and biofuels2. From the start, the Commission made serious efforts to downplay the impact of the HC. The name in itself does not quite reflect a strong sense of ambition: performing a 'health check' remains at a safe linguistic distance from the more intrusive notion of 'reform' or 'review'. The Commissioner for Agriculture and Rural Development, Mariann Fischer Boel, has on several occasions talked soothingly about the HC. According to her, its purpose was "not to change the essential direction of the CAP"3, and "it was never meant to be about further fundamental reform"4. Instead, she presented the HC as "an opportunity to fine tune our tool box"5.
机译:共同农业政策(CAP)的健康检查(HC)于2007年11月启动,并于2008年底结束。欧洲委员会将其作为对2003年CAP改革的评估1进行了评估,该改革解决了三个具体问题。它试图简化单一支付计划(SPS),改善CAP的市场定位,并提供应对新挑战的适当政策工具。本工作文件的范围是对所采取措施的全面概述。因此,将一些初步提案与最终商定的提案进行比较,同时阐明立法过程的某些动态,例如气候变化和生物燃料2。从一开始,委员会就做出了认真的努力,以淡化HC的影响。这个名称本身并不能完全反映出一种强烈的野心:执行“健康检查”与较侵入性的“改革”或“审查”概念之间的语言距离仍然很安全。农业和农村发展专员Mariann Fischer Boel曾多次安慰性地谈论了人道主义事务。她认为,其目的是“不改变共同农业政策的基本方向” 3,“绝不意味着要进行进一步的根本性改革” 4。相反,她将HC视为“微调工具箱的机会” 5。

著录项

  • 作者

    Timmerman Peter.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2009
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号