首页> 外文OA文献 >'The institutions of the EU's Common Foreign and Security Policy: How bureaucratic politics meets network analysis'
【2h】

'The institutions of the EU's Common Foreign and Security Policy: How bureaucratic politics meets network analysis'

机译:“欧盟共同外交和安全政策的制度:官僚政治如何与网络分析相遇”

摘要

The paper is divided in two parts. The first part offers an overview of the institutions of the EU foreign policy as they have unfolded over time: from the EPC until the Amsterdam Treaty. I show that although changes have been brought to the CFSP institutional framework, it mainly remains intergovernmental. The second part of the paper turns to the two theoretical frameworks chosen to explain why the institutions of the CFSP do not work. I first show how the institutional framework is the source of inter- and intra-structural clashes, using a bureaucratic politics approach issued mainly from the works of Graham Allison, Morton Halperin and Guy Peters. I then turn to network analysis, and show why it is the sufficient complement to bureaucratic politics. Finally, I conclude by analyzing theoretical and policy implications of the framework used, and by pointing to some criticisms that can be addressed to network analysis.
机译:本文分为两部分。第一部分概述了随着时间而发展的欧盟外交政策机构:从EPC到《阿姆斯特丹条约》。我表明,尽管对CFSP的体制框架进行了更改,但它仍主要是政府间的。本文的第二部分转向选择的两个理论框架来解释为什么CFSP的机构不起作用。我首先使用主要由格雷厄姆·艾里森,莫顿·哈珀林和盖伊·彼得斯的著作发表的官僚政治方法,来说明制度框架是内部和内部结构冲突的根源。然后,我转向网络分析,并说明为什么它是对官僚政治的充分补充。最后,我通过分析所使用框架的理论和政策含义,并指出一些可以解决网络分析的批评来得出结论。

著录项

  • 作者

    Piana Claire.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2001
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号