首页> 外文OA文献 >'Institution-Induced Problem Solving: Problem-Oriented Micro-Institutionalization and the Cases of the European Steel Crises in the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC)'
【2h】

'Institution-Induced Problem Solving: Problem-Oriented Micro-Institutionalization and the Cases of the European Steel Crises in the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC)'

机译:“机构引发的问题解决:以问题为导向的微观制度化以及欧洲钢铁协会(ECsC)中欧洲钢铁危机的案例”

摘要

Given the theoretical presumption of most institutionalist approaches based on the Coase-theorem that institutions contribute to cooperation and thus to problem solving beyond the hierarchical coordination of the nation state, the question comes up whether this assumption proves true empirically and, if so, under which conditions. As the European steel crises show, the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC) was, despite its strong supranational design and its powerful instruments, not able for more than twenty years to contribute to the solution of these crises. Examining the cases of the European steel crises, it seems that the afore-mentioned presumption proves true under the following two preconditions which, moreover, presuppose each other. First, the specific combination of strategies of action applied by the Commission regarding the policy formulation and the implementation phase, and second, the organization-induced mechanism which in this paper will be presented as "problem-oriented micro-institutionalization," which means that the organization, induces the creation of further actors and infrastructures at those sites, where cooperation problems have been located. In the case of the European steel crises, it seems apparent that the ECSC with its original institutional structure was not able to get the crises under control. Rather problem solving required the supplement of the original widely meshed institutional structure by further actors and infrastructures – a process which can be illustrated by a matryoshka, the Russian wooden doll with smaller and smaller dolls inside.
机译:考虑到大多数基于科斯定理的制度主义方法的理论推论,即制度为合作做出了贡献,从而为民族国家的等级协调之外的问题解决做出了贡献,因此提出了一个问题,即该假设是否凭经验证明是正确的,如果是这样,在什么情况下条件。正如欧洲钢铁危机所显示的那样,尽管其强大的超国家设计和强大的手段,欧洲煤钢共同体(ECSC)仍无法在20多年内为解决这些危机做出贡献。从欧洲钢铁危机的案例来看,上述推定似乎在以下两个前提条件下是成立的。首先,是委员会在政策制定和实施阶段所采取的行动策略的特定组合,其次,是由组织引发的机制,在本文中将其称为“面向问题的微观制度化”,这意味着该组织促使在那些存在合作问题的地点创建更多参与者和基础设施。就欧洲钢铁危机而言,显而易见的是,ECSC拥有其原始的体制结构,无法控制危机。解决问题的方法需要通过进一步的参与者和基础设施来补充原始的,广泛划分的机构结构,这一过程可以用俄罗斯套娃(俄罗斯套娃内部越来越小)来说明。

著录项

  • 作者

    Buntrock Oliver.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2006
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"de","name":"German","id":7}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号