首页> 外文OA文献 >Citizens' deliberations and the EU democratic deficit. Is there a model for participatory democracy? TAIF Nr. 1/2009
【2h】

Citizens' deliberations and the EU democratic deficit. Is there a model for participatory democracy? TAIF Nr. 1/2009

机译:公民的审议和欧盟的民主赤字。是否有参与式民主的模式? TaIF Nr。 1/2009

摘要

There is a longstanding debate on the EU’s democratic deficit. Recently, the EU has responded to this by, for example, including the idea of participatory democracy in the Lisbon treaty. This corresponds to first experiments with means for citizens’ participation that are rooted in the idea of participatory and deliberative democracy and supported by the EU Commission. In contrast to interest group politics, these attempts aim at including ‘normal’, i.e. non‐interested and unorganized citizens into policy‐making. Examples of such ‘democratic experimentalism’ are the citizens’ deliberation ‘Meeting of Minds’ or the European Citizens’ Consultations on Europe’s future. The objective of the paper is to discuss these models and their specific problems against the background of the general democratic deficit debate. The key questions are: Are these examples ‘best practices’? What are their effects? And what can we learn from them for the possibilities of participatory governance in the EU?
机译:关于欧盟民主赤字的争论由来已久。最近,欧盟对此作出了回应,例如在《里斯本条约》中纳入了参与性民主的构想。这对应于以公民参与方式为基础的第一个实验,该实验植根于参与性和协商性民主的理念,并得到了欧盟委员会的支持。与利益集团政治形成对比,这些尝试的目的是将“正常”人群,即无利益和无组织的公民纳入决策范围。这种“民主实验主义”的例子是公民审议的“思想会议”或欧洲公民关于欧洲未来的磋商。本文的目的是在一般民主赤字辩论的背景下讨论这些模型及其特定问题。关键问题是:这些示例是否是“最佳实践”?它们有什么作用?对于欧盟参与式治理的可能性,我们可以向他们学习什么呢?

著录项

  • 作者

    Abels Gabriele.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2009
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号