首页> 外文OA文献 >Extending Citizenship Rights to Third Country Nationals: The Correlation between Migration and Integration: A Sample from South Europe. CEPS Working Document No. 175, October 2001
【2h】

Extending Citizenship Rights to Third Country Nationals: The Correlation between Migration and Integration: A Sample from South Europe. CEPS Working Document No. 175, October 2001

机译:将公民权利扩展到第三国国民:移民与融合之间的相互关系:来自南欧的样本。 CEps第175号工作文件,2001年10月

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Various issues arise in the European context with respect to the boundaries of citizenship; one of the main questions is to what extent the division between the European Union citizens and third country nationals will increase, especially if "deepening" of the Union leads to more tightening of its external borders. This paper addresses the question of how far citizenship rights can be extended to third country migrants in the EU? The paper is divided into two parts; the first is a brief theoretical approach to questions about the parameters of citizenship in the EU. The second part focuses on Italy and Spain as new receiving states affected by NorthSouth migration in the Mediterranean (their policies, people's attitudes, internal distribution of migrants, etc.) and compares their current position with the countries who have had a tradition of labour immigration since the1960s. It contrasts policy and practice vis-à-vis Maghrebi nationals in these two countries, although both are Mediterranean states in close geographical proximity to North Africa. The analysis suggests that the problems encountered by the different Mediterreanean EU members have, in some respects, to be treated on an individual basis. My empirical focus is mainly centred on labour immigration from the Maghreb countries (Morocco, Algeria and Tunisia) and the public policy implications for the EU as a supranational Community rather than as a group of individual member states. I have chosen the Maghrebi immigrants not only because they constitute a high percentage of immigrants residing and working at present in the EU (about 2.5 million), but because their numbers have increased significantly (for both economic and political reasons). The empirical material largely relates to legally resident migrant workers in the EU and their families. The conclusion attempts to show why the EU cannot avoid dealing with this issue at least to some extent. The development of the EU's principles of the free movement of persons within the Community in order to work in another member state, equal treatment and social justice will be tested as they apply to the position of legally resident third country nationals.
机译:在欧洲范围内,关于国籍界限的问题很多。主要问题之一是,欧盟公民与第三国国民之间的分歧将在多大程度上扩大,特别是如果欧盟的“深化”导致其对外边界的进一步收紧。本文讨论的问题是,公民权利可以在欧盟范围内扩展到第三国移民?本文分为两部分:首先是对欧盟公民身份参数提出问题的简要理论方法。第二部分关注意大利和西班牙,它们是地中海受南北迁移影响的新接收国(其政策,人民态度,移民的内部分布等),并将其当前地位与具有自1960年代以来的劳务移民。它与这两个国家的马格里比国民的政策和实践形成了鲜明的对比,尽管它们都是地中海国家,地理位置都非常接近北非。分析表明,在不同方面,欧盟中欧不同成员国遇到的问题必须在个别基础上加以解决。我的经验重点主要集中在来自马格里布国家(摩洛哥,阿尔及利亚和突尼斯)的劳务移民,以及对欧盟作为超国家共同体而不是作为单个成员国集团的公共政策影响。我之所以选择Maghrebi移民,不仅是因为他们在欧盟目前居住和工作的移民中所占比例很高(约250万),而且因为其人数已显着增加(出于经济和政治原因)。经验材料主要涉及欧盟及其家庭中的合法居民移民工人。该结论试图说明为什么欧盟不能至少在某种程度上避免处理这一问题。欧盟在共同体内人员自由流动以在另一成员国工作,平等待遇和社会正义的原则的发展将受到检验,因为它们适用于合法居民的第三国国民的职位。

著录项

  • 作者

    Apap Joanna.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2001
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号