首页> 外文OA文献 >Hub-and-Spoke or Else? Free Trade Agreements in the Enlarged EU – A Gravity Model Estimate. CEPS ENEPRI Working Papers No. 37, 1 June 2005
【2h】

Hub-and-Spoke or Else? Free Trade Agreements in the Enlarged EU – A Gravity Model Estimate. CEPS ENEPRI Working Papers No. 37, 1 June 2005

机译:Hub-and-spoke还是其他?扩大后的欧盟自由贸易协定 - 一种引力模型估计。 CEps ENEpRI工作论文第37号,2005年6月1日

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The aim of this paper is to estimate the effect of the EU’s eastern enlargement on the trade patterns of the Central and Eastern European countries (CEECs) that joined the Union in May 2004. In particular, the paper investigates whether and how the EU’s free trade agreements (FTAs) with the CEECs have affected centre-periphery and intra-periphery trade flows. It also evaluates whether the EU-membership factor has had the added positive effects on exports from the CEECs as anticipated. The analysis focuses on bilateral trade flows between eight CEECs and the EU-23, for which a gravity equation is estimated using a system GMM dynamic panel data approach. The results support the assumptions that gravity forces and ‘persistence effects’ do indeed matter. With respect to the effect of FTAs, evidence is found that FTAs between EU countries and CEECs matter. Yet there is also evidence that the presence of intra-periphery agreements have helped to expand intra-periphery trade and limit the emergence of a hub-and-spoke relationship between the EU and the CEECs. These results have important policy implications for the trade strategy of EU candidate countries in south-eastern Europe as well as in the southern Mediterranean. According to the empirical results, these countries should move towards a regional free trade area as exemplified by the Central European Free Trade Agreement and the Baltic Free Trade Agreement to avoid hub-and-spoke effects.
机译:本文旨在评估欧盟东扩对2004年5月加入欧盟的中欧和东欧国家(CEEC)贸易模式的影响。特别是,本文研究了欧盟是否以及如何进行自由贸易与CEEC达成的协议(FTA)影响了中心周边和周边内部贸易流量。它还评估了欧盟成员因素是否对CEEC的出口产生了预期的额外积极影响。分析着重于八个CEEC与EU-23之间的双边贸易流量,为此使用系统GMM动态面板数据方法估算了重力方程。结果支持这样一种假设,即重力和“持久性效应”确实很重要。关于自由贸易协定的效果,发现有证据表明欧盟国家与CEEC之间的自由贸易协定很重要。然而,也有证据表明,存在周边协议有助于扩大周边贸易,并限制了欧盟与CEEC之间建立轮辐关系的出现。这些结果对东南欧以及地中海南部的欧盟候选国的贸易战略具有重要的政策意义。根据经验结果,这些国家应向中欧自由贸易协定和波罗的海自由贸易协定所例证的区域性自由贸易区迈步,以避免轮辐效应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号