首页> 外文OA文献 >Current Issues in Evaluating Structural Reforms within the Lisbon Process; comments and recommendations about the Lisbon Methodology (LIME) Working Group. Bruegel Policy Contribution/February 2007
【2h】

Current Issues in Evaluating Structural Reforms within the Lisbon Process; comments and recommendations about the Lisbon Methodology (LIME) Working Group. Bruegel Policy Contribution/February 2007

机译:里斯本进程中评估结构改革的当前问题;关于里斯本方法论(LImE)工作组的意见和建议。 Bruegel政策贡献/ 2007年2月

摘要

In 2005, shortly after taking office, the Barroso Commission replaced the failed Lisbon process initiated in 2000 (Lisbon 1) by a new one (Lisbon 2) which gave centre stage to the National Reform Programmes (NRPs). A year later, in a paper written at the request of the Austrian Presidency, Jean Pisani-Ferry and I critically reviewed the new process and concluded that “the outcome is mixed at best”. In particular, we emphasised that “There is no explicit methodology behind the evaluation of the NRPs by the Commission.”
机译:2005年,就职后不久,巴罗佐委员会(Barroso Commission)用新的程序(里斯本2)取代了2000年启动的里斯本程序(里斯本1),该程序成为了国家改革计划(NRP)的中心。一年后,在我应奥地利轮值主席的要求写的一篇论文中,我和让·皮萨尼·费里(Jean Pisani-Ferry)批判性地审查了新程序,并得出结论“结果充其量是混杂的”。我们特别强调,“委员会对NRP进行评估的背后没有明确的方法。”

著录项

  • 作者

    Sapir Andre.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2007
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号