首页> 外文OA文献 >Bond market transparency: To regulate or not to regulate… ECMI Policy Briefs No. 4, 12 December 2006
【2h】

Bond market transparency: To regulate or not to regulate… ECMI Policy Briefs No. 4, 12 December 2006

机译:债券市场透明度:监管或不监管...... ECmI政策简报2006年12月12日第4号

摘要

This ECMI Policy Brief attempts to contribute to the ongoing policy debate on MiFID art. 65.1, which tasks the Commission with conducting a study to report on whether the trade transparency requirements that currently apply to share trading ought to be extended to non-equity markets. It presents the pros and cons of introducing greater transparency into the marketplace, including a model on the possible impact of increasing transparency. The paper also highlights the insufficient level of data available to market participants and regulators on volumes and aggregate bond market activity, as well as the lack of appropriate information made available to retail investors, suggesting that dealers may have little time to come up with a solution, and that an industry code of conduct may be an appropriate avenue – and one preferable to legislative initiatives – for introducing more transparency uniformly (within each fixed income asset class) across the EU.
机译:本ECMI政策摘要旨在为正在进行的有关MiFID艺术的政策辩论做出贡献。 65.1,委员会要求委员会进行研究,以报告当前适用于股票交易的贸易透明度要求是否应扩展到非股票市场。它介绍了将更大的透明度引入市场的利弊,包括关于增加透明度可能产生的影响的模型。该论文还强调指出,市场参与者和监管机构无法获得有关交易量和债券市场总体活动的数据水平,以及散户投资者缺乏适当的信息,这表明交易商可能没有时间提出解决方案。 ,而且行业行为准则可能是在整个欧盟范围内(在每个固定收益资产类别中)统一引入更高透明度的一种适当途径,并且比立法举措更可取。

著录项

  • 作者

    Casey Jean-Pierre.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2006
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号