首页> 外文OA文献 >Judicial review, separation of powers and democracy: the problem of activist constitutional tribunals in postcomunist Central Europe
【2h】

Judicial review, separation of powers and democracy: the problem of activist constitutional tribunals in postcomunist Central Europe

机译:司法审查,权力分立和民主:后中欧共产主义宪政法庭的问题

摘要

It has become a commonplace belief that the constitutionalization of rights implies the introduction of strongly counter-majoritarian devices into the political system. Conventional wisdom in the current constitutional discourse in the postcommunist countries of Eastern and Central Europe has it that constitutional rights, in order to be meaningful, require a system of constitutional review of political branches performed by non-elected branches of the government, and in particular, by the judiciary. The rise of constitutional tribunals in almost all the countries of the region - though in some countries they achieve higher prominence, independence, and power than in others - is a testimony to the force of this conventional wisdom.
机译:人们普遍认为,权利的宪政化意味着将强大的反专制制度引入政治体系。在东欧和中欧后共产主义国家当前的宪法论述中,传统观点认为,宪法权利为了有意义,需要对由非当选政府部门执行的政治部门进行宪法审查的制度,特别是,由司法机构负责。该地区几乎所有国家的宪法法庭的兴起(尽管在某些国家中,它们比其他国家都具有更高的知名度,独立性和权力)证明了这种传统智慧的力量。

著录项

  • 作者

    Sadurski Wojciech;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号