首页> 外文OA文献 >Vizi «carnali» e vizi «spirituali»: il peccato tra anima e corpo
【2h】

Vizi «carnali» e vizi «spirituali»: il peccato tra anima e corpo

机译:“肉体”的恶习和“精神”的恶习:灵魂与身体之间的罪恶

摘要

The traditional distinction between carnal and spiritual vices testifies the capacity that the structure of the capital vices had of adapting to the changes of the moral doctrines. Both the "spiritual fathers" of the structure use this classification for underlying the different role of soul and body in the generative process of the vices. In Cassiano's monastic programme of perfection the contraposition between concupiscence of the flesh and concupiscence of the soul determines a clear line of demarcation between two different types of proliferation of vices. On the other side Gregory the Great, who universalises the scheme, outlines an unidirectional path: pride, spiritual root of evil, triggers a process of exteriorisation which has its acme in the two carnal vices (gluttony and lust), in which the body is directly involved. As it was in Adam's case, every sin is a sin of pride which causes a fall in carnality. This, however, weakens the contraposition between the two categories and indeed it can very often be found in stereotyped forms. If in the monastic culture the tendency is to identify all sins as faults of the flesh, in Abelard's reflection, starting point for a fresh formulation of the problem, the "interior" is totally responsible for the individual's morality: for the Scholastic theology it becomes not possible to conceive a sin which has origin in the body. However, throughout the pastoral literature of the 13th century the distinction between carnal and spiritual vices remains, but it is transferred within each vice, which can be analysed in its interior nature or in its external manifestations. The body, involved in all the seven vices, serves the function of instrument and at the same time is the place in which the visible signs of a sin are inscribed: this vision is a sign of a radically mutated intellectual climate, in which the newly acquired medical and psychological knowledge offer the possibility of analysing the problem within a different definition of the relations between soul and body.
机译:肉欲和精神上的恶习之间的传统区别证明了资本恶习的结构具有适应道德学说变化的能力。该结构的两个“精神祖先”都使用此分类来表示罪恶产生过程中灵魂和身体的不同作用。在卡夏诺的修道院修行程序中,肉体的自尊与灵魂的自尊之间的对立决定了两种不同类型的恶习扩散之间的分界。在另一侧,使计划普遍化的格雷戈里大帝概述了一条单向的道路:骄傲,邪恶的精神根源,引发了外部化的过程,在两个肉体(贪食和欲望)中都达到了顶峰,身体在其中直接参与。就像在亚当的案子中一样,每一个罪都是骄傲的罪,会导致肉欲的下降。但是,这削弱了这两个类别之间的对立,实际上,它经常以刻板印象的形式出现。如果在修道院的文化中,趋势是将所有的罪恶都认定为是肉体的错误,那么在阿贝拉德的反思中,即重新提出问题的出发点,“内部”就完全负责个人的道德:对于经院神学,它变成了无法想象起源于身体的罪恶。但是,在整个13世纪的田园文学中,肉欲和精神上的恶习之间的区别仍然存在,但它是在每个恶习中转移的,可以从其内部性质或外部表现形式进行分析。身体参与了所有的七个恶习,发挥了仪器的功能,同时又是一个刻有罪恶迹象的地方:这个异象是一种彻底改变的智力环境的标志,其中新获得的医学和心理知识为在灵魂与身体之间关系的不同定义中分析问题提供了可能性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Vecchio Silvana;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2002
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 it
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号