EXPERIENTIAL MEANING BREADTH AND GRAMMATICAL udCOMPLEXITY REALIZATION VARIATIONS OF W. SHAKESPEARE’S udKING LEAR AND J. CROWTHER’S KING LEAR ud

摘要

udThis research is aimed to analyze experiential meaning breadth and udgrammatical complexity realization variations of W. Shakespeare’s King Lear and J. udCrowther’s King Lear. This research tries to answer three questions. The first is how udthe experiential meaning breadth and grammatical complexity realization variations are udrepresented in W. Shakespeare’s King Lear and its translation J. Crowther’s King Lear. udThe second is what contextual factors motivate the occurrence of the experiential udmeaning breadth and grammatical complexity realization variations in question. The udthird is what contextual effects resulted from the experiential meaning breadth and udgrammatical complexity realization variations in translation context. udThis research applied the descriptive qualitative method with the quantitative uddata to strengthen the findings. In conducting this research, the data were analyzed udthrough some steps: reading the ST and the TT of the data, writing all clauses from udboth SE and TE in the data sheet, classifying and analyzing the data using experiential udmeaning breadth and grammatical complexity realization variation analysis based on udthe given parameter, and recapping the data on a table, describing the data in the table udinto words, analyzing field, tenor and mode of the texts to find out the motivating udfactors, and analyzing the motivating factors to find out the textual and contextual udeffects on the texts. udThe findings show that the average number of experiential meaning breadth udvariation which is placed in level “2” or “low” level and it is shown by the number of ud12.18. Meanwhile, the average number of grammatical complexity realization variation udis placed in level “1” or “very low” level and it is shown by the number of 9. Those udlow and very low variations show that the translation has achieved a high level of udequivalence in meaning and realization variations, or this translation is translationally udappropriate. Those variations are motivated by many factors. First, the intra-textual udcontexts, they are diction, contracted and archaic words, different spelling words, udomission, grammatical principles, and paraphrase. Second, there are also many inter-udtextual motivating factors, i.e. inter-related text and situation value (field, tenor, and udmode). Finally, the contextual effects which are caused by motivating factors are the udreadability effects towards the target readers of the two texts, in which the target text udfollows the grammatical rule of the present time and the purpose of creating the texts udwhich is to entertain. ud