首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparative Study: udSchool Role in Disaster Mitigation in Junior High School in Indonesia and Philippines
【2h】

Comparative Study: udSchool Role in Disaster Mitigation in Junior High School in Indonesia and Philippines

机译:比较研究:ud印度尼西亚和菲律宾初中学校在减灾方面的作用

摘要

Disaster mitigation education is needed for disaster-prone country so that the number of casualties during disasters can be minimized. It can be done effectively and systemically by the school institution. Disaster mitigation education can be done optimally by the school to the students through building the awareness of disaster risks as early as possible, but in the reality, the education of disaster mitigation conducted by the school is not optimal. By doing a comparative study of disaster mitigation education in Indonesia and the Philippines, it can be obtained an empiric picture of students' level of awareness of disaster so that the school can design more contextual education by developing an education of disaster mitigation in accordance with each school. udThis research applies two approaches i.e. qualitative and quantitative approach. The quantitative approach uses T-Test to analyze the similarities and differences related to students’ awareness on disaster mitigation at secondary school in Bantul, Yogyakarta and Munoz, Philippines. The qualitative approach is used to dig the deeper information about the similarities and differences of the students’ awareness on disaster mitigation related to students’ awareness on disaster mitigation at those two schools. The researchers chose Indonesia and Philippines as the site of the research because those countries possess the characteristics as the high-risk of disaster country. The schools chosen for this research are also located in the area which have a big risk of disaster, especially flood. They are one school in Munoz Nueva Ecija Philippines and a school in Bantul Indonesia which has ever faced flood and earthquake. The research subject are the students of secondary school in Munoz Philippines and Bantul Indonesia, the researcher took one class as the research subject and three teacher and the head master of each school to give information related to the school policy for disaster mitigation education  Data are collected by using interviews, questionnaires, observation and participation as well as documentation. In analyzing the data, three key activities are carried out: Notice things, Collect things and Think about things.udThe research result describe that there are differences on the secondary school students’ awareness level in Bantul, Indonesia and Munoz, Philippines viewed from ORID analysis based on interpretation test on t-test result. Levene’s Test is used to test the varians homogeneity of the groups. From the Levene’s test, it is known that p-value= 0.134 bigger than α =0.05, so that it is concluded that the assumption of the two variants could be fulfilled evenly. Therefore, this research used result of t-test of two independent samples with the assumption that both variants are same. The result of t-test showed that the value of t= - 7.442 and p-value= 0.00. It can be concluded that there are differences on the average ORID score of the students of Secondary school in Munoz, The Philippines and Bantul, Indonesia. The average ORID score of students of secondary school in Bantul is mean = 114.0889, better than the average ORID score of students of secondary school in Munoz Philippines; mean = 93.7115. The most dominant differences between those schools laid on the cognitive awareness i.e. students in Munoz are more rational than the students in Bantul on understanding a disaster event. Besides, the students in Munoz are more responsive in facing the disaster that the students in Bantul. On the non-structural dimension of mitigation, the role of school and teacher tends to be similar i.e. has not been intensively socialize the awareness to reduce the risk of disaster to the students. The understanding gained by the students usually derived from their experience in facing the disaster. From the structural dimension of mitigation, schools in Munoz, Philippines tends to anticipate the structure of the school building with the design that is more ready to face hurricane but they did not pay big attention to face flood because based on the demographical structure the location is difficult to avoid the flood sent from other district. The building structure of the secondary schools in Munoz is not designed to avoid flood from the river nearby. However, there have not been any victim resulted from disaster in both schools in Bantul and Munoz
机译:易受灾害的国家需要减灾教育,以便使灾害期间的伤亡人数降至最低。可以由学校机构有效而系统地完成。通过尽早建立灾难风险意识,学校可以对学生进行最佳的减灾教育,但实际上,学校进行的减灾教育并不是最佳的。通过对印度尼西亚和菲律宾的减灾教育进行比较研究,可以了解学生对灾害的认识水平,从而使学校可以根据各自的需求开展减灾教育,从而设计更多的情境教育。学校。 ud这项研究采用两种方法,即定性和定量方法。定量方法使用T-Test来分析与学生在菲律宾日惹Bantul和菲律宾Munoz的中学对减灾意识有关的异同。定性方法用于挖掘关于这两家学校的学生对减灾意识的异同的更深层信息。研究人员选择印度尼西亚和菲律宾作为研究地点,因为这些国家具有高风险国家的特征。选择进行这项研究的学校也位于发生灾害特别是洪水的风险较大的地区。他们是菲律宾Munoz Nueva Ecija的一所学校,也是印度尼西亚Bantul的一所学校,那里曾经遭受过洪水和地震。研究对象为菲律宾Munoz和印度尼西亚Bantul的中学学生,研究人员以一堂课为研究对象,每所学校的三名老师和校长提供与学校减灾教育政策有关的信息数据已收集通过使用访谈,问卷,观察和参与以及文档。在分析数据时,进行了三个关键活动:注意事物,收集事物和思考事物。 ud研究结果表明,从ORID角度来看,印度尼西亚班图尔和菲律宾Munoz的中学生意识水平存在差异基于t检验结果的解释检验进行分析。 Levene检验用于测试各组的varians同质性。根据Levene检验,可以知道p值= 0.134大于α= 0.05,因此可以得出结论,两个变量的假设可以均匀地满足。因此,本研究使用两个独立样本的t检验结果,并假设两个变量均相同。 t-检验的结果表明,t = -7.442,p-值= 0.00。可以得出结论,菲律宾Munoz和印度尼西亚Bantul的中学学生的平均ORID分数存在差异。班图尔(Bantul)中学学生的平均ORID得分为平均值= 114.0889,高于菲律宾Munoz中学学生的平均ORID得分;平均值= 93.7115。这些学校之间最主要的区别在于认知意识,即在了解灾难事件方面,穆诺兹的学生比班图尔的学生更理性。此外,与Bantul学生相比,Munoz学生面对灾难的反应更快。在缓解的非结构性维度上,学校和教师的角色趋于相似,即尚未对意识进行深入社交以减少对学生的灾难风险。学生获得的理解通常来自他们面对灾难的经验。从缓解的结构角度来看,菲律宾Munoz的学校倾向于采用更易于应对飓风的设计来预见教学楼的结构,但他们并没有特别注意应对洪水,因为基于人口结构,地理位置很难避免其他地区发出的洪水。 Munoz中学的建筑结构并非旨在避免附近河水泛滥。但是,班图尔和穆诺兹两所学校都没有任何灾难造成的受害者

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号