首页> 外文OA文献 >THE COMPARATION STUDY OF LABORATORY EXPERIMENT AND udCOMPUTER SIMULATION METHODS IN INCREASING STUDENTS’ udCOGNITIVE ACHIEVEMENT AND SCIENCE PROCESS SKILLS ON THE udTOPIC OF LINEAR MOTION
【2h】

THE COMPARATION STUDY OF LABORATORY EXPERIMENT AND udCOMPUTER SIMULATION METHODS IN INCREASING STUDENTS’ udCOGNITIVE ACHIEVEMENT AND SCIENCE PROCESS SKILLS ON THE udTOPIC OF LINEAR MOTION

机译:实验室与实验室的比较研究提高学生的计算机模拟方法关于理论的认知成就和科学过程技巧线性运动的主题

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This research aims to compare the effectiveness of laboratory experiment and computer udsimulation methods in the teaching-learning of physics. It can done by testting the difference of cognitiveudachievement and science process skills for students who learn physics, on the topic of linear motion, by udusing laboratory experiment and computer simulation methods. This topic includes motions along a udstraight line with a constant velocity and a constant acceleration. udThe research method was a quasi-experiment with pretest-posttest experimental group design. It udwas conducted in SMAN 2 Wates. The population was all students in this school and the sample was the udX-grade students. The sampling technique was the cluster random sampling. After drawing lots, the X-Agrade student was the experiment group using simulation and the X-C-grade student was the experiment udgroup using experiment laboratory. Data were collected by using pretest and posttest, based on students’ udcognitive achievement and science process skills. Data analysis method to test hypothesis was Manova ud(Multivariate Analysis of Variance). Before hypothesis testing, the pre-requisite analysis was done, that is udthe normality of data distribution and variance homogeneity.udThis research shows that (1) there were the increasing differences of cognitive achievement and udscience process skills between students who learn physics on the topic of linear motion by using udlaboratory experiment and computer simulation methods; (2) the laboratory experiment method was more udeffective than the computer simulation.
机译:本研究旨在比较实验室实验和计算机模拟方法在物理教学中的有效性。它可以通过测试实验室实验和计算机模拟方法来测试学习线性运动的物理学生的认知,成就和科学过程技能的差异。本主题包括以恒定速度和恒定加速度沿 ud直线进行的运动。 ud研究方法为准实验,具有前测后测实验组设计。它是在SMAN 2 Wates中进行的。人口是这所学校的所有学生,样本是 udX级学生。抽样技术是聚类随机抽样。抽签后,使用模拟的X年级学生是实验组,使用实验实验室的X年级学生是实验 udgroup。根据学生的 u认知成就和科学过程技能,使用前测和后测收集数据。检验假设的数据分析方法是Manova ud(方差多变量分析)。在进行假设检验之前,先进行了先决条件分析,即 ud数据分布的正态性和方差同质性。 ud这项研究表明:(1)学习物理的学生之间的认知成就和 udscience过程技能的差异越来越大通过实验室实验和计算机模拟方法来研究线性运动。 (2)实验室实验方法比计算机模拟更有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号