首页> 外文OA文献 >A comparative assessment of biomass ash preparation methods using X-ray fluorescence and wet chemical analysis
【2h】

A comparative assessment of biomass ash preparation methods using X-ray fluorescence and wet chemical analysis

机译:使用X射线荧光和湿化学分析比较生物质灰分制备方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectroscopy is a rapid method used to determine the composition of biomass ash, but the accuracy of the method is sensitive to various factors including ash preparation methods. In this study different types of biomass ash were examined by using wet chemical analysis (WCA) and compared with the respective XRF results. The biomass ash was initially prepared in accordance with the European Standard method at 550 °C. At this low combustion temperature the amount of residual unburned carbon is significant. To eliminate this, the ashes were heated at higher temperatures: a batch of twenty biomass ashes were heated at 850 °C and a batch of five heated to 815 °C. At these higher temperatures there may be loss of inorganic components by vaporisation. Variation in these effects may lead to unreliable results. The relationship between XRF and WCA results are given by regression equations. The ashes processed at 815 °C show better agreement between the two analysis methods.
机译:X射线荧光(XRF)光谱法是一种用于确定生物质灰分组成的快速方法,但是该方法的准确性对包括灰分制备方法在内的各种因素敏感。在这项研究中,使用湿化学分析(WCA)检查了不同类型的生物质灰分,并与各自的XRF结果进行了比较。最初根据欧洲标准方法在550°C下制备生物质灰分。在如此低的燃烧温度下,残留的未燃烧碳量非常大。为了消除这种情况,将骨灰在更高的温度下加热:将二十种生物质灰分在850°C下加热,将五种生物质灰分加热到815°C。在这些较高的温度下,可能会因蒸发而损失无机成分。这些影响的变化可能会导致结果不可靠。 XRF和WCA结果之间的关系由回归方程式给出。在815°C下处理的灰烬在两种分析方法之间显示出更好的一致性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号