首页> 外文OA文献 >International migrants’ use of emergency departments in Europe compared with non-migrants’ use: a systematic review
【2h】

International migrants’ use of emergency departments in Europe compared with non-migrants’ use: a systematic review

机译:与非移民的使用相比,国际移民在欧洲使用急诊部门:系统评价

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: International migration across Europe is increasing. High rates of net migration may be expected to increase pressure on healthcare services, including emergency services. However, the extent to which immigration creates additional pressure on emergency departments (EDs) is widely debated. This review synthesizes the evidence relating to international migrants’ use of EDs in European Economic Area (EEA) countries as compared with that of non-migrants. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, The Cochrane Library and The Web of Science were searched for the years 2000–16. Studies reporting on ED service utilization by international immigrants, as compared with non-migrants, were eligible for inclusion. Included studies were restricted to those conducted in EEA countries and English language publications only. Results: Twenty-two articles (from six host countries) were included. Thirteen of 18 articles reported higher volume of ED service use by immigrants, or some immigrant sub-groups. Migrants were seen to be significantly more likely to present to the ED during unsocial hours and more likely than non-migrants to use the ED for low-acuity presentations. Differences in presenting conditions were seen in 4/7 articles; notably a higher rate of obstetric and gynaecology presentations among migrant women. Conclusions: The principal finding of this review is that migrants utilize the ED more, and differently, to the native populations in EEA countries. The higher use of the ED for low-acuity presentations and the use of the ED during unsocial hours suggest that barriers to primary healthcare may be driving the higher use of these emergency services although further research is needed.ud
机译:背景:整个欧洲的国际移徙正在增加。较高的净迁移率可能会增加对包括紧急服务在内的医疗服务的压力。但是,移民在多大程度上给急诊部门(ED)带来了更大的压力,人们对此争论不休。这篇综述综合了与非移民相比,国际移民在欧洲经济区(EEA)国家使用ED的证据。方法:对MEDLINE,EMBASE,CINAHL,Cochrane图书馆和Web of Science进行了2000-16年的搜索。有报告报道国际移民与非移民使用ED服务的研究符合纳入条件。纳入的研究仅限于在EEA国家和英语出版物中进行的研究。结果:收录了二十二篇文章(来自六个东道国)。 18篇文章中有13篇报道了移民或某些移民子群体对ED服务的使用量增加。人们发现,在非社交时间内,移民更有可能出现在急诊室,并且比非移民更有可能使用急诊室进行低敏度演示。在4/7的文章中看到了呈现条件的差异;特别是移徙妇女中的妇产科诊治率更高。结论:本次审查的主要发现是,移民与欧洲经济区国家的原住民相比,对ED的使用更多,且有所不同。急诊室在低视力演示中的使用率较高,而在非社交时间使用急诊室的方法表明,尽管需要进一步研究,但初级保健的障碍可能正在推动这些急诊服务的较高使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号