首页> 外文OA文献 >Bayesian inference for comorbid disease state risks using marginal disease risks and correlation information from a separate source
【2h】

Bayesian inference for comorbid disease state risks using marginal disease risks and correlation information from a separate source

机译:合并疾病的贝叶斯推断使用边缘疾病风险和来自单独来源的相关信息来评估风险

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background. Public health interventions are increasingly being evaluated for their cost-effectiveness. Such interventions act `upstream' on the determinants of ill health and therefore may reduce the incidence of several diseases. In this case the risks of the separate diseases are likely to be correlated at the individual level, and considerable comorbidity may be present. An economic evaluation should take this comorbidity into account, but estimates of the risks and intervention effects may only be available separately for each disease. This paper proposes a method for combining marginal disease risks and treatment effects with correlation information from a separate source in order to estimate comorbid disease risks and treatment effects.ududMethod. A case study is presented based on a physical activity cost-effectiveness model. The correlation between the risk of coronary heart disease, stroke and diabetes is estimated from cross sectional data using a Bayesian multivariate probit model. This information is then combined with disease specific marginal baseline risks and intervention effects to give comorbid disease state risks. The expected numbers of QALYs gained through avoiding the comorbid states is estimated from disease specific utility data under a range of assumptions. Finally, the incremental benefit of physical activity is calculated under these utility assumptions. The difference in effectiveness of the intervention due to its impact on reducing or increasing the disease risk correlations is explored in a sensitivity analysis.ududResults. If comorbidity is not taken into account, total benefit is overestimated compared with all scenarios in which the comorbidity is included in the model. The overestimation is greatest when physical activity is assumed to reduce disease state co-occurrence as well as overall disease incidence.
机译:背景。越来越多地评估公共卫生干预措施的成本效益。这些干预措施对健康状况的决定因素起着“上游作用”,因此可以减少几种疾病的发生率。在这种情况下,单独疾病的风险可能在个体水平上相关,并且可能存在大量合并症。经济评估应考虑到这种合并症,但可能仅针对每种疾病分别提供风险和干预效果的估计值。本文提出了一种将边际疾病风险和治疗效果与来自单独来源的相关信息相结合的方法,以估算合并症的疾病风险和治疗效果。 ud udMethod。基于体育锻炼成本效益模型,提出了一个案例研究。冠心病,中风和糖尿病风险之间的相关性是使用贝叶斯多元概率模型从横截面数据估算得出的。然后,将该信息与特定于疾病的边际基线风险和干预效果相结合,以给出合并疾病状态的风险。在一系列假设下,根据疾病特定的效用数据估算了通过避免合并症获得的QALY的预期数量。最后,在这些效用假设下计算了体育锻炼的增量收益。在敏感性分析中探讨了由于干预措施对减少或增加疾病风险相关性的影响而导致的干预效果的差异。 ud ud结果。如果不考虑合并症,则与模型中包含合并症的所有情况相比,总收益被高估了。当假定进行体育锻炼以减少疾病状态的同时发生以及总体疾病发生率时,高估就最大。

著录项

  • 作者

    Strong M.; Oakley J.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号