首页> 外文OA文献 >Reporting the characteristics of the policy context for population-level alcohol interventions: A proposed 'Transparent Reporting of Alcohol Intervention ContExts' (TRAICE) checklist
【2h】

Reporting the characteristics of the policy context for population-level alcohol interventions: A proposed 'Transparent Reporting of Alcohol Intervention ContExts' (TRAICE) checklist

机译:报告人口级酒精干预的政策背景特征:提议的“酒精干预保险透明报告”(TRaICE)检查表

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

IssuesudEffectiveness of alcohol policy interventions varies across times and places. The circumstances under which effective polices can be successfully transferred between contexts are typically unexplored with little attention given to developing reporting requirements that would facilitate systematic investigation.ududApproachudUsing purposive sampling and expert elicitation methods, we identified context-related factors impacting on the effectiveness of population-level alcohol policies. We then drew on previous characterisations of alcohol policy contexts and methodological-reporting checklists to design a new checklist for reporting contextual information in evaluation studies.ududKey FindingsudSix context factor domains were identified: (i) baseline alcohol consumption, norms and harm rates; (ii) baseline affordability and availability; (iii) social, microeconomic and demographic contexts; (iv) macroeconomic context; (v) market context; and (vi) wider policy, political and media context. The checklist specifies information, typically available in national or international reports, to be reported in each domain.ududImplicationsudThe checklist can facilitate evidence synthesis by providing: (i) a mechanism for systematic and more consistent reporting of contextual data for meta-regression and realist evaluations; (ii) information for policy-makers on differences between their context and contexts of evaluations; and (iii) an evidence base for adjusting prospective policy simulation models to account for policy context.ududConclusionsudOur proposed checklist provides a tool for gaining better understanding of the influence of policy context on intervention effectiveness. Further work is required to rationalise and aggregate checklists across interventions types to make such checklists practical for use by journals and to improve reporting of important qualitative contextual data.
机译:问题 ud酒精政策干预的有效性随时间和地点的不同而不同。在有效的策略可以在上下文之间成功转移的情况下,通常很少探索,很少关注开发有助于系统调查的报告要求。 ud udApproach ud使用目标抽样和专家启发方法,我们确定了与上下文相关的因素会影响人口级酒精政策的有效性。然后,我们利用酒精政策背景和方法报告检查表的先前特征,设计新的检查表,以报告评估研究中的背景信息。 ud ud关键发现 ud确定了六个背景因素域:(i)基线酒精消费,规范和伤害率; (ii)基线承受能力和可用性; (iii)社会,微观经济和人口背景; (iv)宏观经济背景; (v)市场背景; (vi)更广泛的政策,政治和媒体环境。该检查表指定了通常在国家或国际报告中可用的信息,该信息将在每个域中报告。 ud ud含义 ud该检查表可通过提供以下内容来促进证据综合:(i)一种系统且更一致地报告元数据的上下文数据的机制-回归和现实评估; (ii)向决策者提供有关其背景与评价背景之间差异的信息; (iii)调整预期政策模拟模型以考虑政策环境的证据基础。 ud ud结论 ud我们提议的清单提供了一种工具,可以更好地了解政策环境对干预有效性的影响。需要进一步的工作来合理化和汇总各种干预类型的清单,以使此类清单切实可行地被期刊使用,并改善重要定性背景数据的报告。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号