首页> 外文OA文献 >UK DRAFFT: A randomised controlled trial of percutaneous fixation with Kirschner wires versus volar locking-plate fixation in the treatment of adult patients with a dorsally displaced fracture of the distal radius
【2h】

UK DRAFFT: A randomised controlled trial of percutaneous fixation with Kirschner wires versus volar locking-plate fixation in the treatment of adult patients with a dorsally displaced fracture of the distal radius

机译:英国DRaFFT:一项随机对照试验,采用克氏针经皮固定与掌侧锁定钢板固定治疗桡骨远端背侧移位骨折的成人患者

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: In high-income countries, 6% of all women will have sustained a fracture of the wrist (distal radius) by the age of 80 years and 9% by the age of 90 years. Advances in orthopaedic surgery have improved the outcome for patients: many such fractures can be treated in a plaster cast alone, but others require surgical fixation to hold the bone in place while they heal. The existing evidence suggests that modern locking-plate fixation provides improved functional outcomes, but costs more than traditional wire fixation. Methods: In this multicentre trial, we randomly assigned 461 adult patients having surgery for an acute dorsally displaced fracture of the distal radius to either percutaneous Kirschner-wire fixation or locking-plate fixation. The primary outcome measure was the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation © (PRWE) questionnaire at 12 months after the fracture. In this surgical trial, neither the patients nor the surgeons could be blind to the intervention. We also collected information on complications and combined costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) to assess cost-effectiveness. Results: The baseline characteristics of the two groups were well balanced and over 90% of patients completed follow-up. Both groups of patients recovered wrist function by 12 months. There was no clinically relevant difference in the PRWE questionnaire score at 3 months, 6 months or 12 months [difference at 12 months: –1.3; 95% confidence interval (CI) –4.5 to 1.8; p = 0.398]. There was no difference in the number of complications in each group and small differences in QALY gains (0.008; 95% CI –0.001 to 0.018); Kirschner-wire fixation represents a cost-saving intervention (–£727; 95% CI –£588 to –£865), particularly in younger patients. Conclusions: Contrary to the existing literature, and against the increasing use of locking-plate fixation, this trial shows that there is no difference between Kirschner wires and volar locking plates for patients with dorsally displaced fractures of the distal radius. A Kirschner-wire fixation is less expensive and quicker to perform. Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN31379280.
机译:背景:在高收入国家中,到80岁时,将有6%的妇女腕部骨折(radius骨远端骨折),到90岁时,将有9%的妇女骨折。骨科手术的进展已改善了患者的预后:许多此类骨折可单独用石膏石膏治疗,但其他一些则需要手术固定,以在愈合时将骨固定在适当的位置。现有证据表明,现代锁定板固定可改善功能,但其成本要高于传统的钢丝固定。方法:在这项多中心试验中,我们将461例因radius骨远端背侧急性骨折而接受手术的成年患者随机分配为经皮Kirschner线固定或锁定板固定。主要结局指标为骨折后12个月的患者评级腕部评估©(PRWE)调查表。在这项外科手术试验中,患者和外科医生都不能对干预视而不见。我们还收集了有关并发症,综合成本和质量调整生命年(QALY)的信息,以评估成本效益。结果:两组的基线特征平衡良好,超过90%的患者完成了随访。两组患者的手腕功能均在12个月后恢复。 PRWE问卷评分在3个月,6个月或12个月时无临床相关差异[12个月时差异:–1.3; 95%置信区间(CI)–4.5至1.8; p = 0.398]。每组并发症的数量没有差异,QALY的获得差异也很小(0.008; 95%CI –0.001至0.018)。克氏针固定术是一种节省成本的干预措施(–727英镑; 95%CI – 588英镑至–865英镑),尤其是在年轻患者中。结论:与现有文献相反,并且反对越来越多地使用锁定板固定,该试验表明,对于sch骨远端移位的骨折患者,克氏针和掌侧锁定板之间没有差异。克氏针固定器价格便宜,执行速度更快。试用注册:现行对照试验ISRCTN31379280。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号