首页> 外文OA文献 >Discretion on the frontline: The street level bureaucrat in english statutory homelessness services
【2h】

Discretion on the frontline: The street level bureaucrat in english statutory homelessness services

机译:前线的自由裁量权:英国法定无家可归者服务中的街头官僚

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This article employs Michael Lipsky's street level bureaucrat conceptual framework to explore the exercise of discretion in frontline homelessness service delivery. It is the first to apply Lipsky's model to English homelessness services at the outset, and builds on earlier investigations which have uncovered how the use of illegitimate discretion can potentially lead to detrimental outcomes for service users affected by homelessness. This topic is particularly salient in light of the current politically austere climate, whereby statutory homelessness services have experienced an increase in service users, yet resources, if anything, are declining. Interview findings from twelve local authorities found evidence of unlawful discretion, which was attributed to a complex mesh of individual, intersubjective, organisational and central-led factors. However, the use of negative discretion was chiefly underpinned by higher level pressures around resource scarcity and strict targets.
机译:本文采用了迈克尔·利普斯基(Michael Lipsky)的街头官僚概念框架来探讨一线无家可归者服务提供中的自由裁量权。它是首先将Lipsky的模型应用于英语无家可归服务的基础上,并且是基于早期的调查而得出的,这些调查揭示了使用非正当的酌处权如何可能给受无家可归影响的服务使用者带来不利的后果。鉴于当前的政治严峻气候,这个主题尤其突出,法定无家可归服务的服务使用者有所增加,而资源(如果有的话)正在减少。来自十二个地方当局的访谈发现发现了非法酌处权的证据,这归因于个人,主体间,组织和中央主导因素的复杂联系。但是,消极裁量权的使用主要是由围绕资源稀缺和严格目标的更高层次压力所支撑的。

著录项

  • 作者

    Alden S.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号