首页> 外文OA文献 >Linking the multi-level perspective with social representations theory: Gasifiers as a niche innovation reinforcing the energy-from-waste (EfW) regime
【2h】

Linking the multi-level perspective with social representations theory: Gasifiers as a niche innovation reinforcing the energy-from-waste (EfW) regime

机译:将多层次视角与社会表征理论联系起来:气化器作为一种利基创新,加强了废物能源(EfW)制度

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The multi-level perspective (MLP) theorises technological change as a process of niche innovations competing with incumbent socio-technical regimes. As a mid-range theoretical framework, the MLP invites complementary, more detailed theorisation of salient issues, especially the roles of socio-political agency in changing regime rules around technological competition. Taking a socio-cognitive perspective, this paper links the MLP with social representations theory, to show how a new technology is diversely ‘anchored’ in a familiar one for different agendas. The case study is a specific niche innovation – thermal treatments of municipal solid waste (MSW) within the UK's wider regime of energy-from-waste (EfW). Through landscape-level changes, controversy over incinerators has destabilised the EfW regime's rules. This instability has opened up opportunities for gasifiers as a niche innovation, yet gasifiers have also become an extra focus for conflict over incinerators' wider role in the waste hierarchy. Agents compare thermal-treatment options for MSW according to various criteria which have unstable, changing rules. These express different socio-cognitive frameworks, analysed here as diverse social representations of novelty. The case study offers an insiders' perspective on endogenous enactment, i.e. the conflicting roles of socio-political agency in shaping transition pathways.
机译:多层次视角(MLP)将技术变革理论化为利基创新与现有社会技术体制竞争的过程。作为一个中端的理论框架,MLP要求对突出问题进行补充,更详细的理论化,尤其是社会政治机构在围绕技术竞争改变制度规则方面的作用。从社会认知的角度出发,本文将MLP与社会表征理论联系在一起,以展示一种新技术是如何在熟悉的技术中以多种方式“锚定”在不同议程上的。该案例研究是一项特殊的利基创新-英国更广泛的“以垃圾为能源”(EfW)制度中的城市固体废物(MSW)热处理。通过景观层面的变化,对焚化炉的争议破坏了EfW政权的规则。这种不稳定性为气化炉提供了一种利基创新机会,但由于焚化炉在废物分类中的更广泛作用,气化炉也成为冲突的额外焦点。代理商会根据各种标准(具有不稳定且不断变化的规则)比较MSW的热处理选项。这些表达了不同的社会认知框架,在这里被分析为新颖性的各种社会表征。案例研究提供了内部人对内生法则的观点,即社会政治代理在塑造过渡路径中的冲突作用。

著录项

  • 作者

    Levidow L; Upham PJ;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2017
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号